The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Southern Arena Stadium → Bo Stadium  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

alternate name not mentioned in target article -1ctinus📝🗨 23:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - this appears to be a totally different stadium also in Bo, Sierra Leone. "Southern Arena Stadium" opened last year according to what I can find ([1], [2], no idea how reliable these sources are). I suppose it's possible that the new stadium was actually a rebuild of the older one but I'm not sure. A7V2 (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Circumstances changed after the second relist. Changes may be done boldly, or a subset of the nomination, or multiple nominations may be done if there is discussion still required. Jay 💬 08:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Order of vanishing → Zeros and poles  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Multiplicity of a root → Multiplicity (mathematics)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Multiplicity of a root of a polynomial → Multiplicity (mathematics)#Multiplicity of a root of a polynomial  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Multiple root → Multiplicity (mathematics)#Multiplicity of a root of a polynomial  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Simple root → Polynomial#Solving polynomial equations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Simple root (polynomial) → Polynomial#Solving polynomial equations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Simple zero → Multiplicity (mathematics)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Double root → Multiplicity (mathematics)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Double roots → Multiplicity (mathematics)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Repeated root → Multiplicity (mathematics)#Multiplicity of a root of a polynomial  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Repeated roots → Multiplicity (mathematics)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I feel like there should be some consistency in these redirects, and it's not immediately obvious to me how. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They could all go to Multiplicity (mathematics)#Multiplicity of a root of a polynomial, with the addition of a sentence or so to cover order of vanishing. Charles Matthews (talk) 18:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, Simple pole and Order of a pole (the latter created recently by me) also point at Zeros and poles; not sure if the multiplicity article would be more relevant here as well. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot comment on all of the items above. I agree for one item: Repeated root → Multiplicity (mathematics)#Multiplicity of a root of a polynomial. Taweetham (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Just notified of this discussion at Talk:Multiplicity (mathematics) for the 10 other redirects. Jay 💬 14:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We should get more opinions on such a large, bundled nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Update: Repeated root is no longer a redirect. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  In that case, "multiple root" and the final four should definitely point there, though the others are still inconsistent. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thailand Under-19 cricket team → Cricket Association of Thailand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at target. Cremastra (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment We do have Thailand women's national under-19 cricket team. Geschichte (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If we had a substantive article, it would not be at this badly-capitalized title. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Housing s at Saint Joseph's University → Saint Joseph's University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Created in error; this was the page title for less than a minute. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was refine to Burglary#History. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Burglary (history) → Burglary#Historical definition  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete an orphaned redirect with the title of an unlikely search term. Cyber the tiger (talk) 18:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this appears to be a {{R from merge}} and is at a plausible search term for someone wanting to learn about the history of burglary. Thryduulf (talk) 18:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wouldn't refining to burglary#history be better? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine to Burglary#History per Cogsan, since section was apparently renamed. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Death of Maumoon Abdul Gayoom → Maumoon Abdul Gayoom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Death and state funeral of Maumoon Abdul Gayoom → Maumoon Abdul Gayoom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

I am unable to find news about the guy's death. WP:TOOSOON, in my opinion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a potential WP:HOAX. Steel1943 (talk) 21:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I don't really understand the reasoning for creating this but it is actively misleading. -- Whpq (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both as WP:HOAXes until his death and/or funeral actually occur. We don't need to mislead people into thinking others are alive or dead with these kinds of redirects. Regards, SONIC678 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• FC Djursholm → Djursholm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Better with redlink. Weird redirect. Jonteemil (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned and so not helpful. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Starmergeddon → 2024 United Kingdom general election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Term no longer present in target article. A sentence about it (Former prime minister Boris Johnson campaigned for the Conservatives and warned against giving Starmer a large majority (which he referred to as "Starmergeddon", a term he also used in the Daily Mail).) was added by the redirect creator when they created this redirect on 3 July; that sentence was trimmed down to remove the word an hour later. The redirect creator has also since been blocked for block evasion. Belbury (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 12:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tropical Depression Crising (2021) → 2021 Pacific typhoon season#Tropical Depression 03W (Crising)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I noticed that 03W and Crising are same redirects. However, Crising is only Philippine name from PAG-ASA, it seems that the redirect article "Tropical Depression Crising (2021)" should be delete as no longer cheap redirects, altough they are same designation but different classification from PAG-ASA and JTWC. So, only "03W (2021)" will retain for main redirect page. Icarus58 (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per nom. Nom claims that the titles of the redirect and its target have referred to the same topic at some point. Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Just realized that ... the nominated redirect is a double redirect. Its current target, Tropical Depression 03W (2021), is a redirect towards 2021 Pacific typhoon season#Tropical Depression 03W (Crising). In other words, when I wrote "keep", I meant "retarget to 2021 Pacific typhoon season#Tropical Depression 03W (Crising)". Steel1943 (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  So, I already changed this redirect into original target. However, I suggest that Tropical Depression Crising (2021) is a typographic error and most of the admins are retarget as {{R from misspelling}} or delete under the significance of CSD: G6. Icarus58 (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Steel1943. I understand where the nom is coming from, since there wasn't any depression named "Crising" per se (as PAGASA claimed it was a tropical storm, and therefore, why it was named), but these are technicalities that an average reader wouldn't be aware of; so it's still a plausible and potentially useful redirect. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Natoinal Kick a Ginger Day → Red hair#Modern-day discrimination  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This should have the same outcome as #Natoinal kick a ginger day. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the rationale at the related RFD. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 16:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. wbm1058 (talk) 17:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Far-right riots → 2024 United Kingdom riots  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Wayyyy too vague for a redirect. There have been many far-right riots in history, such as the one in Charlottesville in 2017. Delete. -1ctinus📝🗨 20:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or retarget I cannot seem to find any page or section specifically about far-right rioting, the closest being the page on rioting. There is also Right-wing terrorism (which some of the UK riots has been described as by some people) and List of ethnic riots, but not all far-right rioting might be described as such. Xeroctic (talk) 20:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate if there are indeed more topics that cover far-right riots. CNC (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget - I think a few good sources to avoid WP:SYNTH would justify a paragraph/couple sentences at Riot#Classification as a type of 'political riot'. Tule-hog (talk) 23:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It seems the 'index' of riots is largely subsumed in the index found at Protest. Tule-hog (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig or retarget. I don't know what the best target for this highly plausible search term is, but it isn't one specific riot or set of riots so the current target is wrong. Thryduulf (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  How about Far-right terrorism as a redirect? -1ctinus📝🗨 13:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Far-right terrorism redirects to Right-wing terrorism so it's a good {{R from subtopic}}, however I don't see the connection to this discussion about Far-right riots? Most riots are not terrorism and most terrorism's only connection to rioting is tangential. Thryduulf (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 13:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion is divided between Delete, Disambiguate and Retarget but there is no agreed upon new target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The reader probably wants to go to the current target but (a) we can't send them there because as an encyclopaedia these riots aren't the clear primary topic in terms of historical far-right riots, and (b) in 5 years' time this redirect, if not maintained, will look rather silly. This is outside the remit of a disambiguation page: search results are the most helpful, in lieu of a potential list. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per J947 as no single target, and no mention at Riot#Classification. Jay 💬 13:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate or delete as this is far too vague. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ǎs → As (Roman coin)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I don't have any idea why this redirects here; the Latin "as" has no diacritic. asilvering (talk) 07:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. My only guess (and it's a wild one) is that this string has been used as the pronunciation respelling of the subject somewhere? According to Portuguese Wiktionary, this is a word in the Basaa language meaning "milk" or "mind", but that's the only thing I can find. Awkward42 (talk) [the alternate account of Thryduulf (talk)] 12:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this implausible redirect. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's sort of an easier to typeset version of a breve. Sometimes a with caron is easier to type than with breve and may be used in place of it. Self-described Sophist (talk) 03:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Latin doesn't use breves or carons, and it would be difficult for anyone to search with one even if it were plausible that someone might want to—which it's not. P Aculeius (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree it's unlikely anyone would want to search for this topic with a breve or caron, but if they did then doing so is not necessarily difficult - for example anyone using a compose key with the default linux sequences can produce Ǎ with the sequence ComposecA and Ă with ComposebA. Thryduulf (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  But what percentage of readers know how to do that? It's not even a universal command. In some operating systems, there's no shortcut for inserting a caron or a breve, unless you create one. But as far as I know, the only place you'll ever find 'as' with a breve is in a Latin grammar or dictionary; only student texts and dictionaries will use macrons or breves, and most of them use only macrons. I've never seen carons used in place of breves, since they're equally hard to type. P Aculeius (talk) 20:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It doesn't matter what proportion of readers know how to do this, what matters is that some do (for example speakers of languages that include these characters will be familiar with how to enter them). They can also be copied and pasted, or links followed from elsewhere. This just means that titles with diacritics are not implausible by virtue of having diacritics - this title is implausible because there is no connection with the subject but e.g. Pască with the same diacritic is plausible. Thryduulf (talk) 01:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• San Francisco Bay Intl → San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I know this is kind of silly but with the name change should this redirect point to San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport or San Francisco International Airport? Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the name containing "Bay". Hyphenation Expert (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah that was kind of what I leaning towards but I figured I bring it here just to be on the safe side. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it's ambiguöus then shouldn't it probably be set to point to a disambiguation page? Self-described Sophist (talk) 03:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There's a distinguishing hatnote to resolve any confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Case insensitiv → Case sensitivity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Case sensitiv → Case sensitivity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Case-sensitiv → Case sensitivity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Case-insensitiv → Case sensitivity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible/trivial (WP:UNNATURAL) last letter omissions; sensitiv or insensitiv do not exist, so a search for "insensitiv" will currently only show one of these redirects as the single result rather than applying an automated correction and displaying all relevant content. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. They're not unnatural or implausible - they're German. Either way, no reason to keep these redirects. -- asilvering (talk) 08:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I've never heard this kind of partial anglicism in German. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. These clutter the Search bar making Case insensitivity harder to find. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Anthony Walsh (weed) → Anthony Walsh (author)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Anthony Walsh (dagga) → Anthony Walsh (author)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Anthony Walsh (ganja) → Anthony Walsh (author)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

As noted at Special:PermanentLink/1246780142#Redirects gone amok, these are implausible redirects and not the kind of disambiguations a reader would reasonably expect for a Wikipedia article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not the type of disambiguators usually used on Wikipedia. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 02:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Street Gangs → River City Ransom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Extremely ambiguous. Roasted (talk) 01:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• There is a hatnote, which perhaps could be improved slightly to reflect the specific target of street gang (which is Gang#Street). I think WP:DIFFCAPS is enough here to keep, unless there is something else I'm missing? A7V2 (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:DIFFCAPS. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:DIFFCAPS, the hatnote currently there is sufficient for people who have been misdirected. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Natoinal kick a ginger day → Red hair#Modern-day discrimination  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible typo. No incoming links. One view in 3 months according to pageviewws. Reconrabbit 18:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per WP:CHEAP. Cremastra (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment adjacent character transpositions are a very likely form of typo. The target mentions "National Kick a Ginger Day" and the redirects National Kick a Ginger Day and national kick a ginger day exist -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 23:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:COSTLY. Regardless if the correct spelling of "national" makes this phrase a likely search term, typing one word wrong then typing 4 other words correctly is incredibly unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "National" is not a hard word to spell. It speaks volumes that this is the only use of "natoinal" on Wikipedia, redirects included, for the thousands of pages that have the word "national" in its name. Otherwise not useful or likely, definitely not pleasant. The creator is since blocked. We can have some dignity with what we maintain here. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Looks like a demonstrably plausible typo to me. Stats show 10 hits this past year... which is only slightly less than the number of hits to the no-caps but otherwise no-typo National kick a ginger day (12 hits), and ironically even more than the 9 hits this year for the properly capitalized National Kick a Ginger Day. As a specific reply to Steel1943 above, we typically consider a single typo more likely than multiple typos. Saying "typing one word wrong then typing 4 other words correctly is incredibly unlikely" is diametrically opposite to how we usually do things around here... would you have !voted to keep "natoinal kikc a gigner dya", with a transposition typo in every word? I don't think you would have, and I certainly wouldn't either... more typos are LESS likely than single typos. Fieari (talk) 01:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure Steel agrees that redirects with single typos are more likely than those with multiple typos. Separate from that though, we need to think about the benefit of "typo" redirects as a whole. As a community, we've been missing mark here, fmpov. Not every typo needs a redirect. Just because there's a de facto benchmark indicating "2+ errors is implausible", doesn't make every title with 1 error realistic. That's still HUNDREDS of "one-error" typos per title, between character transpositions, to swapping a "l" with a "k" and every neighboring letter forever, etc.

Perhaps counter-intuitively, the longer the search term, the less likely it would benefit from any given typo redirect. We see these a lot actually, one example being Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 13#Dream haorders. There was no mention of a "haorder" typo anywhere on Wikipedia, despite Hoarder existing, and a plethora of other mentions of "hoard" and "hoarding", yet none with this transformed spelling. There's really just one way to misspell "Hoard", and that's "Haord" (or Hord, I suppose, but that's a different page). But for "Hoard", there's only like 3 possible letter swaps one could make in a short subject. It's a small and acceptable price to pay, = EZ maintenance.

However, if someone were to create equivalent typo redirects for, say, Hoard of the Dragon Queen, i.e. Haord of the Dragon Queen, Horad of the Dragon Queen, Hoard of the Dargon Queen, well, this is a massive technical debt. Especially when zero of these words are "difficult words to spell" anyway. We can't and shouldn't be maintaining any dreamable transmogrification of a full set of words in an already long title... and then do the same thing for 7 million pages in article space.

The "2+ typos rule" is quite good for immediate problem detection, but it's not the whole story. I've (personally) !kept titles with more than 2 typos, and !deleted ones with less. It's about expected usefulness-impact and precedent. Euphemism is a difficult word. Euphinism swaps the e for an i, and the m for an n, yet I honestly wouldn't bat an eye at either used in a sentence. Maybe good redirect? Positive value, probs. But if we're dealing with something like Griffin Science-Fantasy Bokolet Number One... like... no reasonable person would ever type everything verbatim, swap in "bokolet" instead of "booklet", and then finish the term. If such a title is considered reasonable, get ready to add Bokolet redirects for the thousands of pages that contain "booklet"; it's not value, in fact it's closer to negative value due to the precedent. Especially so that "Bokolet" or Bokoworm or Bokobinding haven't ever, and never will exist, and it's even less likely in a long title assuming everything else is correct. And even these are reminiscent of when we saw the set of Mnecraft titles get deleted @ Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Inecraft and etc., the creator disrupting NPP to prove a point after Minecrat got deleted here: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 12#Minecrat. One error does not = good typo, even if it's a letter-drop or letter-swap.

"National kick a ginger day" has zero affinity towards being spelled as "natoinal", and definitely less than every other page that uses the word "national" and never fathomed to have a "natoinal" variant. So people who type "Natoinal", click the tab key, will be greeted with a page about kicking gingers, even though they only typed 8 letters and none of them had anything to do with red hair. Nothing for Natoinal, Natoin, Ratoinal, Ratoin, Elatoin, etc. In fact I don't think there's a single page on Wikipedia that misspells a "tion" ending as "toin". (Testing: Per this quarry: [3], there are zero pages on Wikipedia which misspell a word containing "tion", as "toin". Just the "Natoinal Gingers" set on page 2.) Anyway this was more than I expected to type lol. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as implausible, per Utopes. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate, entering "natoinal" in the search box will currently show this redirect, along with Natoinal Kick a Ginger Day, which for some reason had not been nominated thus far, as the only search results, instead of applying the automatic corrections of MediaWiki's search engine. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per 1234qwer. and don't kick any gingers... Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 02:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Phronima atlantica → Phronima  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

It is inappropriate to have a species name as a redirect to higher ones such as a genus. It creates the impression that a page exists and makes it impossible to use template:species list as it will create a circular redirect back to the genus page. There is no history to be preserved in this redirect so it should be a redlink until such time as an editor decides to create a page for the species. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination as MOS:CIRCULAR. Icarus58 (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. SirBrahms (talk) 09:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).