The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• UEFA Euro 2028 squads → UEFA Euro 2028  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nothing about the squads at the target, making it a misleading redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 15:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom, too early to be dealing with squads at this future tournament. GiantSnowman 15:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep all-lowercase variant, Delete other two. Jay 💬 10:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Director-general of Justice and Home affairs → Director-General of Justice and Home Affairs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Director-General of Justice and Home affairs → Director-General of Justice and Home Affairs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Director-general of justice and home affairs → Director-General of Justice and Home Affairs  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unused redirects not linked anywhere else; target article was obscure and short so I redirected it, but these alternate capitalizations do not have substantial page history other than that they were moved for incorrect spelling. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Director-general of justice and home affairs Using lowercase for all but the first word does not seem unlikely, and redirects are cheap. Delete the other two due to the mixture of capitalization errors which are unlikely search terms IMO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:16, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That'd do. MimirIsSmart (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Per discussion and G7 request by creator. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Richard Wagner hates Jewish music → Das Judenthum in der Musik  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Odd search term; we do not have redirects like "How to make pie" or "Cars run on oil". Even if the redirect is plausible, I'd expect this to go to some general article about Wagner and antisemitism. Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsensical redirect. MimirIsSmart (talk) 13:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Of the couple of stupid redirects I've made, I do have to consider that while sensical, it is not plausible. The title describes wholly what goes on at the target: Richard Wagner hates the contributions of Jewish composers to music. BarntToust 14:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Public image of George Bush. ✗plicit 14:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Criticism of George Bush → Public image of George W. Bush  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This could refer to both presidents. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - we don't have a separate article on public image for the senior Bush; Public image of George H. W. Bush is a subsection redirect to his bio. We could add a hatnote to the target. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete easily could refer to "Read my lips, no new taxes" promise being broken by H.W., or him being Mr. Invisible. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 17:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Too ambiguous. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Public image of George Bush (disambiguation), which links to relevant content for both presidents. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Both this and the dab at Public image of George Bush are silly since pretty much everyone will know (or be reminded of the fact that) there is more than one George Bush. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not true, please read WP:POPE. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Public image of George Bush (disambiguation), which lists both presidents. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:39, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Public image of George Bush (disambiguation) per Presidentman. Thryduulf (talk) 12:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Plannet terror → Grindhouse (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This is a misspelling of "planet," but for some reason, when it was created in 2007, it was redirected to the current target rather than Planet Terror (to be fair, Planet Terror is one of the two films shown in Grindhouse, but it still doesn't fully make sense to redirect it to the page about the latter film as opposed to that about the former). The misspelling is also questionably plausible—a Google search for that exact misspelling shows stuff related to Grindhouse and Terror Planet, but the posters and stuff still show the correctly spelled Planet Terror. As such a situation, I'm proposing we either delete this redirect or retarget it to Planet Terror, and I'd like to hear your thoughts about this. Regards, SONIC678 20:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Terror didn't get its own article until 2009, so that explains why the redirect was made to Grindhouse (film) instead. However, I see no good reason to keep this. Delete. 162 etc. (talk) 02:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:Delete per 162 TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC) — TeapotsOfDoom (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Okmrman (talk · contribs). [reply]

Retarget I think it is a possible mistake. Not the most likely, but I've seen the typo before. CheeseyHead (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 13:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I feel that doubling a consonant in this way is a plausible error, but if it was then the pageviews should show use. They don't: 9 total hits in the year before the nomination date. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep target to Planet Terror perfectly plausible redirect. It's not a hugely popular target, so the hits seem reasonable. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
  
• Delete I don't think 9 hits in the last year indicates that it's worth keeping.★Trekker (talk) 10:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Planet Terror - Unambiguous target, plausible typo, gets some use in-line with the popularity (or lack thereof) of the target article in question. Fieari (talk) 06:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Too many errors - miscapitalized and misspelled. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ppperry. Mediawiki can handle this just fine. Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While I understand the this could be a mis-spelling, this isn't a situation where someone might be typing in Brian Adams to try and find Bryan Adams. This is just not being able to spell "Plannet". I would not create Plannet to redirect to "Planet" for the same reason. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Although it might be a plausible typo, I would just like to note that Plannet doesn't exist as a redirect to Planet and has never existed in it's lifespan (nor should it IMO) Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 10:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The B → B (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete. B (disambiguation) contains no topics referred to as "The B." GilaMonster536 (talk) 04:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep seems like a bunch of them could be so referred to -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:49, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per Gilamonser; no evidence there is anything notable referred to as "The B." OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you take the B or ride on the B, missed the B... there's a load of transport articles listed -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 18:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of them are specifically referred to as "The B," at least on the DAB page. GilaMonster536 (talk) 00:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. To me, I would expect adding the "the" would take me to a disambiguation page or a more specific page rather than a generic article about the letter b. Ca ^{talk to me!} 13:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 13:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak refine to the Transportation section per 65. That seems to contain everything that could plausibly take the definite article. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 14:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• My first thought is that there are a fair number of topics titled The Bee, any of which could be abbreviated to the letter. BD2412 T 16:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Korean People's Revolutionary Army → Korean People's Army  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Redirect target does not mention it. It was a historical formation of Korean People's Army, it has a separate article on some other wikis. Should be just a red link here https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4232821 _{Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here} 07:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

return to red per nom cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• German Medical Science → de:German Medical Science  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Interlanguage redirect with no page history to revert to. Per WP:SRD, Soft redirects to non-English language editions of Wikipedia should be avoided because they are generally unhelpful to English-language readers. Instead, editors should link to the alternate language Wikipedia directly with one of various forms of interlanguage links. There doesn't seem to be any reason why this particular page warrants an exception. Tollens (talk) 07:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target. Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful, and no other redirects to foreign language targets exist. Additionally, the plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (WP:SOFTSP). See here for precedents. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 01:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It should be noted that this was created in November 2024 and was always a redirect, so {{R with history}} somehow doesn't apply twice. Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of sans serif typefaces. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Raleway → Ubuntu (typeface)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect doesn't seem to make sense. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Pinging @Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson: as they made the redirect. This redirect also makes no sense to me, as the only link I can find between the two articles comes from Reddit, and even then it only appears to be used in a game. /etc/owuh $ (💬 | she/her) 02:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There's a raleway font, but as far as I can tell, it has nothing to do with Ubuntu. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 02:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of sans serif typefaces. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hmm, while it is listed there, should it be? This seems like a case where the list should be limited to things that have articles. I don't know much about notability for typefaces and if Raleway is, but the current list entry is just unsourced with no page to link to and just a sample image. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• • • That's an editorial decision for that page. The article is entirely unreferenced but does give minimal information about this font, which is better than nothing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of sans serif typefaces. We have some information, we should provide it to the searcher. Fieari (talk) 06:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Virus' → Virus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Extraneous punctuation Plantdrew (talk) 01:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, leaning delete: This used to be a lower-quality and much less detailed duplicate article of Computer virus (one that's existed since September 2001) for six minutes in 2006 (see here for the most developed version) until Btball redirected it to the current target because [an] article about computer viruses already exist[ed]. I'm not sure the edit history is worth preserving, but if it is, we may need to merge or rearrange it wherever appropriate. Regards, SONIC678 05:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an unlikely typo. Regarding history, the couple of sentences are definitely not worth preserving and the handful of links are already in Computer virus, aside from WhenU SaveNow, though that topic has waned in notability since 2006 ― Synpath 14:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete' per WP:UNNATURAL. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:31, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. not unnatural in my opinion, as it's a plausible misspelling of the possessive form, but not actually plausible enough for keeping cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (@Cogsan is wrong, if I recall correctly you ARE allowed to use just an apostrophe when referring to the possessive form of a plural noun. For example, "my husbands' dogs" would be suitable if you're talking about the dogs of your multiple husbands - emphasis on multiple.)

Even though this did technically have content from 2006, the content is not even HISTMERGE worthy and should've been sent to AFD back in 2006. Although I could plausibly see how someone could get here, in practicality we shouldn't be coddling all the 25 people that got here in the last year. Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 04:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, but "virus" as an uncountable term is on the rare side, and it has like 5 other plural forms cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).