The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 22:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Russia;s anti-LGBT law → Russian anti-LGBT law  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Very unlikely punctuation Rusalkii (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep; semicolon and apostrophe are next to each other on most English QWERTY keyboards. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this WP:UNNATURAL typo. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per 1234qwer1234qwer4. --Un assiolo (talk) 16:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• weak delete unlikely typo --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget Clownussy to Coulrophilia, Soft redirect Þussy to Wikt:þussy, Keep Trussy, Thrussy, Grussy, Morbussy, Spidussy, Delete the rest.. Jay 💬 12:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Trussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Clownussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Thrussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Þussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Dussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ghussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Grussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Dunmussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Orcussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ayleidussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Akulakhanakussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Morbussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Chaurussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Corpussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Daedrussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Tentaclussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Spidussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Khajussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

None of these are mentioned in the article. Rusalkii (talk) 19:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...oh boy. judging from the "mature" mindset of someone who would want to find redirects to this article

• trussy: keep as "haha heehee trans pussy"
• clownussy: keep as plausible alternate spelling of "clussy"
• grussy: keep if it can be argued that it stems from gru, otherwise delete
• morbussy: keep as "oh god we're still doing morbius memes"
• corpussy: SPEEDY DELETE AND SALT, WHAT WAS THE CREATOR THINKING
• tentaclussy: torn between voting to delete as that is the exact opposite of what a tentacle is supposed to do, and keeping per those people's... lacking knowledge in biology
• spidussy: keep as one of the oldest, most iconic -ussy memes i know of. as in it actually predates -ussy being a meme

and delete all the others as obscure cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all as not mentioned at target, except Clownussy which should be retargeted to Coulrophilia as a {{R avoided double redirect|Clussy}}. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  and the things Hyphenation Expert says to do below. Queen of Hearts (talk) 21:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep grussy and thrussy; they are mentioned at target. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 00:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect Þussy → wikt:þussy. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:thussy. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Does have a wiktionary:thussy wiktionary entry. Rusalkii (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Finally figured out the mass RfD tool to nominate a number of this redirect's siblings above Rusalkii (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep; plausible alternative spelling of Thatchussy, which is mentioned? Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Oh, I should've read the Wiktionary entry; this is a totally different thing. Soft redirect as not mentioned. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft redirect Wiktionary. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nussy → -ussy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"Nussy" not mentioned in main article. Appears to refer to the nose and, uh, may in fact make sense to add to the article? But as long as it isn't in target we shouldn't have the redirect. Rusalkii (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I'm sorry. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You're not forgiven. That being said, switching to keep as nom. Rusalkii (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (reluctantly), now that the article has a mention. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 12:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep now that it's in the article. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 22:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Win quote → Glossary of video game terms#Win quote  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This does not seem to be mentioned at the target any more. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague. I just got a bunch of inspirational qoutes from GSearch. Now I'll go home and be a family man. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ricoh GR → Ricoh GR (large sensor compact camera)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

It seems that this ought to be disambiguated betweeen the pages listed in the hatnotes at the target. (Otherwise, the target should be moved back to this title.) 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate per nom; no PTOPIC between the series of film cameras and the series of digital cameras. Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate per nom. Also add current destination to disambig list (including 2 listed in hatnotes.  — sbb (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Lord Jabu-Jabu → List of The Legend of Zelda characters#Jabu-Jabu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Lord Jabu Jabu → List of The Legend of Zelda characters#Jabu-Jabu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Jabu-Jabu → List of The Legend of Zelda characters#Jabu-Jabu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Jabu Jabu → List of The Legend of Zelda characters#Jabu-Jabu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Character/dungeon of the Legend of Zelda universe that is not mentioned in the target article, Characters of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, or The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. The only mention of this character on Wikipedia seems to be at List of monarchs of fictional countries#Zora Tribe, but I'm pretty sure that target is not the target readers trying to information about this character are intending to go, meaning deletion is probably preferred over retargeting there. Steel1943 (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If there were a lot of page views I'd contend that it should just be changed to mention Jabu-Jabu on the characters or OoT article, but none of them are even double digits, suggesting no one is really using these redirects anyway. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Cukie Gherkin: Just FYI, I apparently had an edit conflict with you when I updated my rationale to include finding a mention at List of monarchs of fictional countries#Zora Tribe, in case that changes your stance. Steel1943 (talk) 17:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Page views aren't necessarily a concern regarding readers finding this information; what's more important is that the information exists if any reader is trying to find that information. Meaning ... should this character be added to an article, probably Characters of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time? (I'm assuming that the content was previously at its current target, considering the target is coded in these redirects, and you are the creator of Characters of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time [assuming my requested history merge has not occurred yet].) Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I think my stance remains the same, as I don't think people would expect to be taken there if they do search for it. As far as page views, they were just offered as an example of an incentive for perhaps mentioning Jabu-Jabu somewhere if he was someone people were searching. As far as the characters page, I think the most that could be done would be to mention Jabu Jabu under Ruto's page, but I'm not sure that would really be enough to warrant redirects. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a stronger consensus. Would it be feasible to add a mention somewhere or is deletion preferable?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-redirect page histories?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The pre-redirect page histories are not useful and attribution is not a concern since all the content has been removed from the target article. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mario party revolution → Mario Party 8  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I'm not able to locate any references that refer to Mario Party 8 as "Mario Party Revolution" or any variation of that phrase. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator's information Red Director (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The Wii was codenamed "Revolution" prior to its final release, and this game was announced early on, so conceptually, it makes sense, though I'm unsure this term was ever actually used... Sergecross73 msg me 22:19, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the term has been used somewhat commonly by various people online (Google "Mario party revolution"). I cannot find any official usage though. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. मल्ल (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Super Mario 64#Health, lives, and power-ups. Jay 💬 14:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Metal Mario → Mario  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Metal Mario" on the target page. Mia Mahey (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert to the article in the page history without prejudice to AfD. Thryduulf (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a plausible search term. It would be very easy to add a sourced mention - it's an alternate name for Mario when he uses a "power up" that makes his body look like metal. Sources like this outline it. An alternate target could be at Super Mario 64#Gameplay, where it's already touched on some there. That's where the concept originated, though it's been used in many games now, so its current target is probably preferable. Sergecross73 msg me 12:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as Metal Mario is a significant recurring character in the Mario franchise spin-offs and thus a plausible search term. A mention should be added at the subject, but I am unopposed to a redirect to Super Mario 64 if that is deemed a better solution. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Fire Mario redirects to Super Mario#Projectiles, Tanooki Mario to Super Mario Bros. 3. Those are about all the 'Marios' I know for sure. Taking a guess at some extra Marios, Ice Mario redirects to Super Mario, and then Hammer Mario and Invincible Mario don't have any pages or redirects. Will readers be expecting to be redirected to wildly disparate pages when they're all effectively variations of the same character? 122141510 (talk) 23:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Super Mario 64#Health, lives, and power-ups, akin to Metal Cap, where it's actually discussed. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 04:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There has been support to point to another target, but multiple sections have been proposed as a refinement. Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Super Mario 64#Health, lives, and power-ups where discussed. Super Mario 64 was the introduction of Metal Mario, so I feel it has higher significance over other targets that may mention Metal Mario. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King#Northrend. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dalaran → Warcraft#Azeroth  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King#Northrend, where it is covered. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as above, multiple sentence about topic there. Rusalkii (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Warcraft IV → Warcraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Looks like someone's crystal ball was faulty. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

my slightly less malfunction-prone crystal ball foresees deletion cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete doesn't exist and not mentioned at target. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Would have been great though. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we have no relevant content. Thryduulf (talk) 11:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King#Northrend. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Howling Fjord → Warcraft#Azeroth  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King#Northrend. Gonnym (talk) 19:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget as above. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade#Plot. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hellfire Peninsula → Warcraft#Draenor (Outland)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade#Plot. Gonnym (talk) 19:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget as above. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. The nominator's rationale was invalid and the only other !vote is in favour of keeping. (non-admin closure) Un assiolo (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Lordaeron City → Warcraft#Azeroth  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "city of Lordaeron" is, in fact, mentioned within that section. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• World of warcraft mounts → Gameplay of World of Warcraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of mounts at the target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as too obscure and in-universe. This is more suited for WoW fandoms/ wikia. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Makeblock. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 00:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• M-Block → MissingNo.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

previously nominated under the grounds that 'm (a glitch similar to missingno.) isn't mentioned in the target article, and kept so that a mention could be added maybe probably. ignoring the part where it wasn't, i forgot one crucial detail in the first discussion... 'm isn't actually referred to as "m-block". the primary topic for every variation of this name seems to be makeblock, which already has mblock as a redirect to it. opinions? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 12:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Makeblock per nom. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Milk & Cream → PaRappa the Rapper  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

unmentioned in any parappa-related articles. to my surprise, milk and cream are closely associated. almost like cream is a dairy product or something. that aside, i haven't found any other possible targets for "milk and cream", so i'll vote for deletion instead of retargeting or dabifying cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Most google hits are, unsurprisingly, people selling milk and cream (or ice cream). Rusalkii (talk) 03:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Deletion is no longer necessary, since the content was restored. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Eli Kowaz → Israel Policy Forum#Eli Kowaz  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. There was a lot (probably too much) content on him earlier, which was removed by User:IPFcomms with the rationale that he was no longer with the org. Unsure if content on him should be in the article, but if it isn't the redirect should be deleted. Rusalkii (talk) 23:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The AfD provided grist to doubt his notability even with the IPF; now that he's no longer there it makes no sense for the redirect to be to IPF. Longhornsg (talk) 23:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @CFA restored the section covering Eli Kowaz, with justification "Restoring section removed by promotional editor". If the section is kept (which I think it shouldn't be, see e.g. LinkedIn confirming he is no longer at the company), the redirect should be too. Rusalkii (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the last relist, the target section was removed again, and the removal was reverted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the target has been stable since 8 August. Jay 💬 18:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Un assiolo (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:IRS → Wikipedia:Reliable sources  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Wikipedia:Independent sources. It seems strange and confusing that WP:IRS redirects to a different place than WP:Independent reliable sources does. One is just an abbreviation of the other, and the inclusion of the 'I' seems to emphasise independence – otherwise, it is sufficient to refer to WP:RS / WP:Reliable sources. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for years the policy was at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 27#Wikipedia:Reliable sources. I don't think the specific independant sources page is more likely than the general one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wikipedia:Independent sources because reliable sources are also discussed there. Sources can be reliable without being independent. C F A 💬 23:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and hatnote per Crouch. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and hatnote. AKK700 06:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. However, retargeting to Resistance during World War II as one of the acceptable targets. Jay 💬 16:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nazi resistance → Werwolf  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I suggest disambiguating between Werwolf and German resistance to Nazism or simply changing the target to the latter. Personally, I have the impression that when most people refer to "Nazi resistance", they are thinking about resistance to the Nazis, not resistance by the Nazis, although perhaps it is not a very clear phrasing. A dispute is evident in the redirect's edit history. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support retarget to German resistance to Nazism; seems like a more natural redirect target than what it is currently. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 02:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- not a helpful redirect to either topic. It does read to me as subversive activities by the Nazis, but unclear what they were "resisting" against. Too ambiguous to be useful. --K.e.coffman (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Resistance during World War II, which covers the resistance movements mentioned above and many others. - Eureka Lott 15:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per K.e.coffman. Note that the two proposed targets are the first and second result when searching for "Nazi resistance", and Werwolf is no. 5 (no. 4 when excluding the redirect), so we can let the search results deal with it. --Un assiolo (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I just looked and found two articles that were linking to that redirect: Hasserode and Shlomo Shafir; I believe the Hasserode article was intending to link to German resistance to Nazism. The Shlomo Shafir article appeared to be trying to link to Resistance during World War II or more specifically to Resistance in Lithuania during World War II. Neither one of them was really intending to link to Werwolf. Linking to Resistance during World War II would have been an acceptable target for both of them, but it might be best to just delete or disambiguate the link (e.g., with three possible meanings: Resistance during World War II, German resistance to Nazism, and Werwolf) for the sake of clarity. I just edited both articles to correct them. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Resistance during World War II is a WP:BROADCONCEPT article that already links to many possible meanings for this term. There's no need for a disambiguation page when we have an existing article that accomplishes the same thing. - Eureka Lott 20:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to either German resistance to Nazism or Resistance during World War II, I think these are much more obvious targets to the phrase "Nazi resistance" than Werwolf. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Cone of answers → Rubber duck debugging  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unfortunately not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia (and technically seems to have a broader context than programming). 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Vague and unmentioned. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Willem B. Drees. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Beyond the Big Bang → Big Bang  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

It seems that this should redirect to Willem B. Drees, where the book is mentioned. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).