The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 08:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Fuçk → Fuck  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This alternative is not attested in the target article. I can't imagine this being a useful respelling, it doesn't mask the word and ç reduces to a c so it wouldn't be useful for subverting filters. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: It also seems that it's not common enough to have an entry in wiktionary (c.f. q:fuçk), so it seems safe to delete. TartarTorte 13:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Implausible search term and unhelpful respelling that is not mentioned at the target article. 〜 Askarion ✉ 16:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Clear consensus that this is a harmless phrase with no reason to delete it, even if the wording is a bit funky. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• United Nations headquarters alternatives → Headquarters of the United Nations#Proposed alternatives  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Very weirdly phrased redirect - it's in the wrong tense so it makes it sound like it's going to lead to a discussion of places that actually exist, rather than places that were considered during the planning stage. Implausible search term, unlikely to ever be linked to. 192.76.8.65 (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - I don't agree with the nom about the wording, it is similar to the section heading anyway. I think while this is unlikely it is at least reasonable and unambiguous. A7V2 (talk) 00:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per WP:CHEAP and the fact that this is not an implausible search term. However, I am not opposed to deletion because of the weird phrasing. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a possible future article title but I can think of better. In any case {{R with possibilities}} isn't the only kind of redirect permitted on Wikipedia. There is nothing wrong with this. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, harmless and the phrasing is not that weird in my opinion. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 01:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think the reason for differing opinions about how weird it sounds is because English avoids using plurals as noun adjuncts [1], and "headquarters" sounds like it should be plural even though it's often treated as singular. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 02:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 08:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Rachel Marsden position on Timber Sycamore → Timber Sycamore#Columnists  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Misspelled (it should be Marsden's), Rachel Marsden has no particular connection to Timber Sycamore and is just one of a multitude of people mentioned in the reactions section, implausible search term. 192.76.8.65 (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - there is some description of her position on Timber Sycamore but this seems an awkward way to search for this, and it seems a very unlikely thing someone would search for. A7V2 (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Is there anything wrong with this redirect? Invasive Spices (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Doesn't seem to fit any purpose of WP:RPURPOSE outside of, possibly, the lack of an 's (which should be fixed with an edit, not preserved with a redirect). Not a possible future article title, not a likely search term, not a phrase that wouldn't be more helpful linked in a more conventional manner (Rachel Marsden's position on Timber Sycamore), assuming the phrase is relevant in an article not already about one of the two of them. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: extremely unlikely search term, while Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 21#Tulsi Gabbard's position on the 2017 Shayrat missile strikes and these/two all support deleting this by precedent. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 08:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Easy payment system → Debit card  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The term is quite a bit broader than debit cards. For example, it's used in the FasTrak article as a system of electronic toll collection. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Way too vague to be a helpful redirect. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 08:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Coordinated violence → Violence#Coordinated violence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Section no longer exists. Steel1943 (talk) 16:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Transformers comics characters. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Tailspin (Transformers) → Transformers (toy line)#Micromasters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No longer mentioned. Is there a better target? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• retarget to List of Transformers comics characters -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 05:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Shhhnotsoloud: What do you think? Jay 💬 14:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jay: Happy with that. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Vector (mathematics and physics). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Abstract vector → Vector  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete. Redirect to dab (!) lacking the term. Hildeoc (talk) 00:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Vector (mathematics and physics) which doesn't necessarily use the term but I think it is the article someone searching this is looking for. Certainly the current target doesn't really make sense. Second preference delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per User:A7V2. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 01:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).