The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. As Tamzin says, send it to RM. (non-admin closure) — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Gilly (A Song of Ice and Fire) → Gilly (character)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The former should be the main page title. Gilly (character) (and Gilly (Character)) should redirect to Gilly (disambiguation)#Characters as there are many fictional characters called Gilly. Serendi^podous 15:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep. @Serendipodous: This belongs as an RM, not an RFD. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 20:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Wajid Khan (Khan music duo) → Sajid–Wajid#Wajid Khan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The duo's name is not Khan, and the redirect's purpose is server at Wajid Khan (composer) Kailash29792 (talk) 11:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I can see why someone would come up with that disambiguator, and the redirect gets a constant trickle of traffic (~1 view per day), so it's serving a function. It's not like this redirect hurts anything. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 15:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  It does hurt because the intended targets like Wajid Khan (composer) and Wajid Khan (music director) get obscured by this. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: How does this obscure two links that point to the same target? —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 21:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like this. Wajid Khan (composer) is thankfully visible, but so is Wajid Khan (Khan music duo) because it is currently at RfD. If the RfD ends with the consensus to keep, it will continue to obscure Wajid Khan (music director) like it is currently doing, as well as Wajid Khan (composer). Kailash29792 (talk) 05:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I still don't understand why it matters which redirects appear in the search bar, if they all point to the same place. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 15:36, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. "Khan" is redundant. If it was "Wajid (Khan music duo)", it still made sense even though the duo's name is not Khan, per nom. If a reader knows him as Wajid Khan already, notwithstanding the lack of last names in the Sajid-Wajid duo, then the Wajid Khan DAB page will lead him to Wajid Khan (music director), another redirect. Jay (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Not harmful or confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.