The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to T52 (classification). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• T52 class → Le Normand-class frigate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The target article mentions an E-52 class, but I don't see anything about a T-52 class either there, on the linked French article, or in an online search. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to T52 (classification). It's a bit of a stretch, but in that article classification and class are used close to interchangably. Class would seem to make sense in this redirect's grammatical construction when referring to the class of athletes rather than the classification of this class itself. — J947 ^[cont] 23:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to T52 (classification). The World Para Athletics organization uses "class" to refer to the different classification levels sometimes. See [1]. Hog Farm (talk) 02:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Pomeranian(dog) → Pomeranian (dog)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The disambiguator is connected to the word here; not useful. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. There needs to be a space between the title and the disambiguator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; useless to nominate or delete. Also, this has fair pageviews. — J947 ^[cont] 23:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Is a missing space really THAT implausible of a typo? Or is there something harmful about this redirect I've completely missed? Thegreatluigi (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per K4. It's not ridiculous, it gets some pageviews, and it's rather old. Hog Farm (talk) 02:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this error. It only gets page views because it's there in the Search box. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. This entire discussion is more costly than either creating or deleting this redirect. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Football(soccer) → Association football  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The disambiguator is connected to the word here, which makes it somewhat less useful. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. There's no space between the title and the disambiguator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• ​​Keep, *cough*. — J947 ^[cont] 22:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • But if we delete this, Football (soccer) (which is the correctly spaced counterpart) will still appear on the search bar, so readers will still get redirected where they want to go regardless of deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, readers will still get redirected where they want to go regardless of deletion a large amount of time but in the end deleting this just unnecessarily slows down the process of finding the wanted page. Why do that? — J947 ^[cont] 05:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Plausible typo and redirects are cheap. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as useless clutter. @J947: Why support creating useless and costly clutters like this? --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Soumya-8974: I don't support creating this, but at the same time I don't see what will be gained by deleting this. Why is this redirect costly? — J947 ^[cont] 18:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 12:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this error: Football (soccer) exists. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Sharkey (disambiguation). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sharkie → Shark  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not useful. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Without commenting on the merits of this redirect, we need to keep this around somewhere. :) — J947 ^[cont] 23:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fantastic. Stood on the redirect for almost a month... — J947 ^[cont] 23:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Sharkey (disambiguation) as {{R from ambiguous term}}; there are three instances on that page. Narky Blert (talk) 08:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Narky Blert. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Narky; good ATD. — J947 ^[cont] 18:56, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Sharkey (disambiguation) per Narky Blert --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Free games. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Freegamer → Game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This does not appear to be a term that is used. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Free games (which is a dab page) or to List of freeware video games. Plausible search term, no reason to delete. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to History of games#Pre-modern. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ancient game → Ancient Olympic Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Doesn't just refer to this, maybe a better target is History of games#Pre-modern? TheAwesomeHwyh 20:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to History of games#Pre-modern per nom, it has plenty of information on this topic. — J947 ^[cont] 22:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to History of games#Pre-modern per nom. Plausible search term for that target. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Englische Sprache → English language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Appears to be Dutch. Besides both being Germanic languages, I'm not sure that the English language has any real ties to Dutch. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Or at least, not enough ties to justify a redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is the German for "English language", a perfectly reasonable search term for German-speaking people tying to navigate our encyclopaedia – see Englische Sprache. The Dutch is Engels. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFOREIGN — Wug·a·po·des​ 03:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFFL. No German speaker reading English WP will need this redirect. Narky Blert (talk) 08:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • No German speaker reading English WP will need this redirect: why would that be the case? — J947 ^[cont] 19:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just because both English and German are Germanic languages does not mean we need a German redirect for the English language 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Chhagal → Goat  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure what this is. Maybe it's "goat" in another language? In any case, I'm not sure its useful. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete apparently in Hindi, it means "goat". Or "canvas water bag". Or "silver anklet". [2]. So we have an WP:XY problem, and the title isn't suitable for disambiguation per WP:NOTDIC. Also it was created in September 2019 by a sockpuppet of a user who was blocked in March 2019, so it qualifies for WP:CSD#G5 too. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per IP. Narky Blert (talk) 08:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. No Indian will ever type "chhagal", when looking for "goat". --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Astronaut. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Astronaunt → New Mexico lunar sample displays  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible typo for Astronaut. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Implausible and useless. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to astronaut; been a plausible misspelling in my experience. CNN have made this mistake. What is to be gained by deleting this? — J947 ^[cont] 22:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per J947. This is one of the useful clutters. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to astronaut as {{R from misspelling}}. Narky Blert (talk) 08:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to astronaut as a misspelling as CNN making the mistake makes it plausible as CNN is a well known website and not user generated 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 20:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. There is no need to create Baaaa pages with other lengths of a's, per Hog Farm's comment. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Baaaaaaaa → Sheep#Vocalisations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Overly-specific amount of a's. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Nice formulation for "now this one's really stupid" :p Yeah, unless we want to also have Baaa, Baaaa, Baaaaa and Baaaaaa - Baa may just have to suffice for the onomatopoeia-minded reader. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is exactly the length of a sheep's bleat. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ​I'm not sure I understand. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as unambiguous and evidently helpful. — J947 ^[cont] 22:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I wouldn't encourage making this, but since it exists, I see nothing detrimental about this. There's no real reason to delete this. It's unambiguous and not harmful. Hog Farm (talk) 02:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Conditional keep if Baaa, Baaaa, Baaaaa and Baaaaaa are created. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 04:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; this page has had only 475 pageviews over a 5-year period, and most of those pageviews probably resulted from people jokingly typing in "Baaaa" in the search box and looking at the results. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Æroplane → Airplane  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a variant of aeroplane. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per wikt:æroplanes. Wiktionary only accepts common misspellings so them having an entry for the word is telling in the evaluation of this redirect. However, the deletion log of wikt:æroplane gives bad vibes at first but that entry has only been deleted as a redirect (under wikt:WT:REDIR#U2) and as a fatuous definition – it hasn't been deleted as a misspelling page. — J947 ^[cont] 22:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above.
• Keep, despite it being an archaic and unusual spelling. HopsonRoad (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, it's a reasonable variant of aeroplane. Hog Farm (talk) 02:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above and the RfD of Wikipædia --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of beaches in New York. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• New York Beach → Coney Island  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I'm not sure that this is particularly useful, there are tons of beaches in the state of New York. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• We have List of beaches in New York and New York Beach Ferry as options. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ​I think List of beaches in New York is the better option of the two. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of beaches in New York. Readers can select their preferred one when they're there (a rare opportunity to employ the pedant's trifecta). Narky Blert (talk) 08:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of beaches in New York as the best we can do for the readers. — J947 ^[cont] 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. New York Beach is a proper noun and there is no such thing; no such beach is listed at List of beaches in New York, so it's somewhat misleading to target it there. New York Beach Ferry is a redirect and is the name of a ferry, not a beach. This averages zero hits per day with no incoming links and will not be missed. Station1 (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• India McPeak → Bowling Green Falcons  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Searching online I could confirm that McPeak is/was an athlete at this university, but without any information about her at the target I don't see a reason for this redirect to exist. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Term does not appear at target article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to New Yorkistan#Hiphopabad. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hiphopabad → Brooklyn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nonsensical. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looks like it was created as a test edit by an account screwing around back in 2008. Clearly don't need it. --Jayron32 18:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to New Yorkistan#Hiphopabad where mentioned. It's about a New Yorker cover art piece which seems to be the origin of the term. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to New Yorkistan#Hiphopabad per IP. — J947 ^[cont] 22:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Personhattan → Manhattan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

What? TheAwesomeHwyh 18:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The history of the redirect indicates this magazine article. — J947 ^[cont] 22:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unlike with #Hiphopabad above, we don't have a Wikipedia article about the magazine article that originated this term, and I don't know of any other place where it would be WP:PROPORTIONal to add it. It probably meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion, and I'll go create an entry when I get some time, but I don't think it's worth a soft redirect from over here. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikopedia → Wikipedia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep this is somewhat plausible because o is located beside i on a keyboard. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs)`23:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per CrazyBoy826. What is to be gained by deleting this redirect? — J947 ^[cont] 23:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep. It's a one letter typo, and a rather plausible one at that. It's not the most likely of misspellings, and admittedly, it's not getting a huge amount of use, but it certainly seems to be reasonable enough to avoid deletion. Thegreatluigi (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Already tagged as {{R from misspelling}}. Single letter typo, adjacent key; not implausible. Narky Blert (talk) 08:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• King Kong(Novel) → King Kong  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• King Kong(novel) → King Kong  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Erroneous disambiguator, was an article. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, its erroneous because the disambiguator has no space between it and "King Kong". TheAwesomeHwyh 18:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And only the uppercase one was an article. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. There needs to be a space between the title and the disambiguator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Answer me – what is to be gained by deleting this redirect? — J947 ^[cont] 23:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Missing space; useless clutter, and the first one also has a miscapitalised qualifier. Narky Blert (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• COVID-12 → Middle East respiratory syndrome  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible redirect. MERS is a coronavirus and shouldn't be called COVID. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 17:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree with the nomination rationale.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• @CrazyBoy826: COVID literally stands for coronavirus disease. — J947 ^[cont] 22:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • COronaVIrus Disease 2019 is different than Coronavirus disease 2012, and it's very unlikely anyone could get confused. 2020 coronavirus's official name is COVID-19, while 2012 coronavirus's is established as MERS. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 23:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Calling it COVID is a fair assumption however. — J947 ^[cont] 23:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Also, this is far less prominent than COVID-19 CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 00:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy as recently created and implausible. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 07:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A search turned up some isolated obvious typos for COVID-19, usually corrected elsewhere in the same document, and nothing about a disease first recorded in 2012. Narky Blert (talk) 13:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Narky. — J947 ^[cont] 19:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Booper → Labrador Retriever  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

What? TheAwesomeHwyh 17:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The search tool turns up several matches, none of which look anything like a primary meaning; let the tool do its job. Narky Blert (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, makes no sense whatsoever. Cavalryman (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Unlikely synonym. Also boops (slang for gentle touch to one's nose/snout) aren't exclusive to labs --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Zipper Labrador → Labrador Retriever  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Was an article in 2005, and claimed to be a " colloquial term referring to a type of Labrador Retriever with an uplifted patch of fur on the nose resembling a zipper." However, I cannot find evidence of this usage online. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Has a strong air of WP:MADEUP about it. Narky Blert (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Cavalryman (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Taichō. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Taicho → Tłı̨chǫ  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Taichō. This redirect was created by a bot as a diacriticless variant of “Tåîchô”. “Tåîchô” is mojibake for “Tłı̨chǫ”.^[1] Since “Taicho” is two steps removed from “Tłı̨chǫ” but a plausible Anglicization of “Taichō”, it should be retargeted to the latter. Gorobay (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Gorobay. Japanese words with "ō" generally get redirected to the same word with "o" (or occasionally, as here, the other way round). For example, Tōkyō, although hardly anyone uses the diacritics even though they are correct. Narky Blert (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Microsoft connect → Microsoft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Microsoft Connect → Microsoft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

The target article contains no information whatever about this software, and the existence of the redirect prevents the upper-right Wikipedia search box from working (which is the precise reason why the RFD process exists at all). (Also, 7¾ years passed since the prior RFD which failed due to no consensus.) Bwrs (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I've added Microsoft Connect to the discussion. Pinging Bwrs. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Looking at the previous discussion, I don't think there's anything in the page history worth keeping. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• O word → Vocative case#English  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Y word → Yid#Usage in European football  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• J word → Jew (word)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned and too many words start with O, Y, and J including words in other languages not just English 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• O, delete per nom. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 13:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Bwrs (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete because it does not even say what the “O word” is. Bwrs (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There would really need to be proper mentions of these terms at the targets.
• Deword, knaves all three. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Balearctic ecozone → Palearctic realm  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

delete; it's a misspelling of Palearctic (not an alternative spelling, like Palaearctic), and has no links. Tom Radulovich (talk) 06:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete "Balearctic" does have a few results on Google that are not derived from Wikipedia. In particular "Balearctic Islands", which looks to me as usually a mistranslation of Balearic Islands/Illes Balears. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's a confusing mixture of Palearctic, Baltic and Balearic. Narky Blert (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep per K4. Redirect was created from a page move in 2014, so deleting this would risk some breakage of links (maybe not internally, but more likely externally). Misspelling also seems plausible. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 07:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Appenine deciduous montane forest → Apennine deciduous montane forests  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

delete; it's a misspelling of Apennine, and has no links.Tom Radulovich (talk) 06:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Tom Radulovich, what is to be gained by deleting this harmless and slightly helpful redirect? It's a valid {{R from misspelling}}. — J947 ^[cont] 06:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also – the redirect was created as the result of a page move, as such K4 applies. — J947 ^[cont] 07:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A likely misspelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947 and Shhhnotsoloud as a plausible misspelling. Regards, SONIC678 17:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and tag as {{R from mispelling}}. It's not at all unlikely; Appenine exists, and got 170 pageviews in 2019. Narky Blert (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Intendo Entertainment System → Nintendo Entertainment System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect created back in 2007 seems to get A LOT less pageviews (the difference being in the millions since July 2015), possibly because of the misspelling of "Nintendo" here...which I'm not sure is very common or plausible. Regards, SONIC678 04:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This appears to have been created in error rather than a common misspelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Even though you'd need to add 'Entertainment System', Intendo is already a thing, an album by Scottish band Bis. Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Implausible misspelling. Narky Blert (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as unambiguous and harmless. — J947 ^[cont] 23:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Gay-related immune deficiency. Gay-related immune deficiency literally mentions this term (though the pneumonia here is capitalized), and is a better target per the IP and SpicyMilkBoy. (non-admin closure) Pandakekok9 (talk) 07:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Gay Pneumonia → HIV/AIDS  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not finding that this is a common usage, Google hits seem to be referencing Pneumocystis pneumonia. Hog Farm (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, misleading and unnecessary. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Gay-related immune deficiency, where this and other non-neutral, outdated names (e.g. gay cancer, which points to the same target) are discussed in historical context and the reader will learn what the correct modern terminology is. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as neologism not well known. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Gay-related immune deficiency, where it is mentioned. This isn't a silly neologism someone made up one day, it's a historical term documented in reliable sources. [3][4]3 (PDF warning) SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 02:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Gay-related immune deficiency per SpicyMilkBoy's reasoning. Dimadick (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per above. --Paul_012 (talk) 01:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: in the search results for this term (which is what we will get if the redirect is deleted), Gay-related immune deficiency is near the very top, and timeline of HIV/AIDS also appears, but neither the main HIV/AIDS article nor Pneumocystis pneumonia are on the first page of hits. Bwrs (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.