The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ribrianne → List of Dragon Ball characters#Ribrianne  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not currently mentioned at the target, appears to have been remove in a March 3rd purge of the target article's less-notable entries. If it's not readded to the article, then this redirect should be deleted. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A Google search turned up nothing but this link and fansites. Simplify the Google search for the latter by deleting this unsourced NN mention. Narky Blert (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Elmhurst station (Amtrak) → Black Hawk (Amtrak train)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• East Dubuque station → Black Hawk (Amtrak train)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Warren station (Illinois) → Black Hawk (Amtrak train)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, these are probably the names of stations that were planned along the route described at the target article. That having been said, without any mentions at the article, these redirects are of dubious utility and I would lean toward deleting them unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Gpedia → Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/GHI#Gpedia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I'm a bit hesitant about approving a mainspace –> WP-space redirect that goes to a section that could easily be mistaken for the body of an actual article, and would thus lean toward deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agree with nom, this wouldn't be a good CNR. I don't think there should be any CNRS to the mirrors and forks list at all, personally. Hog Farm (talk) 21:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It would be different if there were a mainspace equivalent to that list, but there isn't one I can find. There is a List of online encyclopaedias but Gpedia doesn't have an entry there. Thryduulf (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete in line with Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Whiskey Hotel → White House  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unsure about the validity of this redirect. Not mentioned in target article, and a Google search indicates this is the name of a level in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 related to the White House, not mentioned at the COD Modern Warfare 2 page. It's a reference to the NATO phonetic alphabet, but the phrase could stand for anything abbreviated 'WH'. Hog Farm (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can not think of a proper way to mention the Whiskey Hotel in the COD2 article so it can be retargeted. If someone does find a proper way, then retarget. OcelotCreeper (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Yes, per this, "whore" is an example of something abbreviated "WH" and euphemistically called a "whiskey hotel". There are also actual hotels - [1] and [2]. MB 00:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 2024 FIFA Futsal World Cup → FIFA Futsal World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 2028 FIFA Futsal World Cup → FIFA Futsal World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The target contains zero information about both the 2024 and 2028 editions of the FIFA Futsal World Cup. Anybody using these redirects to find specific information on these events will not be left any wiser. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article does not mention 2024 or 2028 at all.

Edit: also WP:CRYSTAL. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 19:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Country- Poland → Poland  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete due to the implausible formatting. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete implausible typo. People do not search up a country by starting with country.

Edit: According to this [[3]], ever since August 4th 2018, this redirect only got 56 pageviews. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Anyone this knows Poland is a country would just type Poland and if for some reason they didn’t they wouldnt have typed country in the first place.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This was created as an article about the country, which linked to the long existing Poland article, the first section was copied from this book about coins and the CIA World Factbook. I've deleted the non-redirect revisions as apparent copyright violations - while the World Factbook is public domain, the book on coins seems to be copyrighted. The redirect is not a likely search term, if someone wanted to make sure they got to the page about the country and not something else then Poland (country) would be the most plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hardball (formerly) with Chris Matthews → Hardball with Chris Matthews  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I guess I understand the thinking here, but it seems very unlikely that anyone would search for a title structured in this way. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 17:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete while I too can see the thinking here I simply can’t see people typing this trying to look up the show.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 18:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep According to this [[4]], this redirect gets at least 10 pageviews a day. OcelotCreeper (talk) 23:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's not the name of a TV show. The pageviews could easily be entirely from people like us browsing the article history rather than from casual browsers looking for information on the show. —Soap— 01:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Just implausible. Who's going to start a search by typing "Hardball (formerly)"? Narky Blert (talk) 09:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wiki82esh/EREV → Erev  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible redirect left over from moving the page to standard article naming convention. — Searingjet (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as housekeeping, G6 candidate? Hog Farm (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Mango#cuisine. Seems pretty uncontroversial (non-admin closure) L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Chile spiced mango → Trader Joe's#Products  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. This was brought up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Archive 40#Chile spiced mango, where suggestions were made to re-target to Mango#cuisine or delete, though no further action has been taken. Paul_012 (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Mango#cuisine and edit the article if chili mangoes are not mentioned. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per OcelotCreeper. Other retailers sell this and there are recipes available for people who want to prepare them at home. —Soap— 00:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kim Su-Ji (volleyball → Kim Su-ji (volleyball)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete per implausible typos. Sawol (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. One would already have the real article be the top search result by the time you place the v. Also when I searched this redirect, I only got to it if I typed everything and I capitalized the j and even then, the redirect was not even a search result. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - we only need to account for likely user errors, not all possible errors. This one is not likely. Hog Farm (talk) 17:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Rohan (Middle-earth)#Geography. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Langflood → Middle-earth#Geography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Alternate name for a Middle-earth river that doesn't have its own article. There is no edit history or attribution that needs to be preserved (it's always been a redirect), and this name is not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. Hog Farm (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I too can find no other mention in WP. Narky Blert (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Rohan (Middle-earth)#Geography: it's the name used in Rohan for the great river Anduin. If there was one river that deserved an article, the Anduin would be it (maybe when I get a really quiet day) but for now the redirect will do fine. I've mentioned it there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget (changing !vote) per Chiswick Chap. Narky Blert (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Rohan (Middle-earth)#Geography per Chiswick Chap. The Geography section actually mentions what Langflood is (which was edited in by Chiswick 1 week ago so good job giving the redirect a good spot to be placed). OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Super Bowl LIX → Super Bowl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Why do we need a redirect for a planned event that won't occur until 2025? Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Hog Farm (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm seeing reliable-seeming news coverage, such as this article from CBS Sports, discussing the upcoming event in the context of changes in NFL expectations. I'm not sure if such material justifies having an article about something so far in the future, though. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per CoffeeWithMarkets. 2025 isn't too far into the future; the examples at WP:CRYSTAL talk about events occurring in the 2030s and 2040s. The Super Bowl is kind of a big deal in America, and a redirect is perfectly plausible, even if an article is not. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you read WP:CRYSTAL it says "If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented." We know nothing about this Super Bowl, and any speculation on a Super Bowl would be going to the one happening next year. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to encourage an article to be created (like Super Bowl LVIII). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There is only one passing mention of Super Bowl LIX in the target article, which is literally just a note that this is the earliest occasion the event could theoretically be held in a region that doesn't have (at the time) an NFL team. Thryduulf (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and recreate in 3 years. People are not likely to search up Super Bowl LIX yet because the only information that we have on it so far is that it is projected to happen in 2025. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is obviously going to be an article someday, unless the roof falls in. Encourage article creation, rather than present readers with a useless redirect with no useful information at the target. Narky Blert (talk) 22:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete WP:MALPLACED wbm1058 (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Parqet (disambiguation) → Parquet (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Weak delete. This was created on 5 August 2006 by User:Bill Sayre and moved 22 minutes later with the correct spelling. It's not used, and we don't have base name Parqet, so technically this could be moved there per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, but Parquet is a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Parquetry, so that would seem unhelpful – were we to retarget it similarly, it would immediately become a candidate for WP:G14 reason (2) 'orphaned "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages'. But I think it falls through the cracks of G14 Reason (1), 'pages that "have titles ending in "(disambiguation)" but disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page'. I could argue that any R on this pattern does that, but most are useful e.g. Colour (disambiguation), so I doubt that argument would get far. 85.238.91.68 (talk) 08:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – no reason is given for deletion. Also, redirects like this are cheap and harmless. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 09:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom's detailed analysis. The redirect would have been WP:G6-speediable at creation, and besides it's misleading to have disambiguation redirects for terms that are not being disambiguated. . – Uanfala (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Leaderboard and swap with disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Leaderboard → Leader Board  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Leaderboard (disambiguation); I don't really think the golf video game is the primary topic at all here. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 02:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom and swap per WP:MALPLACED. Narky Blert (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, good idea to swap. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 21:04, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget and swap the video game and dab per nom and Narky Blert. Thryduulf (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Leader Board is a good title for the video game per WP:DIFFCAPS; I see no reason to change that page. Narky Blert (talk) 20:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. Not everybody will search up Leaderboard intending to search up Leader Board. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom, might be getting into WP:SNOW territory soon. Hog Farm (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 1995 NASCAR Nationwide Series → 1995 NASCAR Busch Series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• 1997 NASCAR Nationwide Series → 1997 NASCAR Busch Series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Series wasn't known as "Nationwide Series" until 2008; leaving this redirect merely causes confusion and anybody with knowledge of the subject would not link to the redirect. Also nominating 1995 NASCAR Nationwide Series. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 01:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Newer NASCAR fans will most likely search things up this way so I can imagine this being useful. OcelotCreeper (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per RHARMFUL and K5 (see here). There is extremely little benefit to be reaped from deleting this redirect. Keep in mind that wikilinks are almost certainly not the primary source of the redirect's viewage; the search bar exists. — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 02:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I have bundled two identical discussions. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Ocelot Creeper and J947. Thryduulf (talk) 14:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Redirects like this are for the benefit of readers who don't have knowledge of the subject. Narky Blert (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.