The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Security company. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Security contracting firm → Mercenary  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A "Security contracting firm" is not necessarily a mercenary organisation, nor a Private military company. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as appears to be no suitable target. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 21:46, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Security company. Steel1943 (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Security company. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. Thryduulf (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Human cytomegalovirus#Immunocompromised adults. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Cytomegalovirus infection in HIV disease → HIV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 08:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Human cytomegalovirus, there's some info there. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Human cytomegalovirus#Immunocompromised adults. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative diseases#Epstein-Barr virus-positive Burkitt lymphoma. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Burkitt's lymphoma in HIV disease → HIV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative diseases#Epstein-Barr virus-positive Burkitt lymphoma, or maybe the top of the article. I think. It's a very technical subject and there might be other options. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to User:Ivanvector's suggestion, or to AIDS-related lymphoma. WhatamIdoing (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to HIV/AIDS activism. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• HIV/AIDS activist → HIV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The word "activist" is not present in the target article. One looking up this term may be attempting to find something about activism against the condition, but I’m not finding any specific retargeting option at the moment. Steel1943 (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator comment: This should now be retargeted to HIV/AIDS activism since that article has now been created. (@Rubbish computer, Lenticel, and WhatamIdoing: Pinging participants other than the creator of HIV/AIDS activism to inform them of the creation of the aforementioned article.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as is not at target. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• A whole category at Category:AIDS activism, but no main article. If the only objection is that the target does not mention the exact word "activist" in the current version of that article, then this could be retargeted to HIV/AIDS, which does. WhatamIdoing (talk) 11:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I went ahead and created the concept article: 'HIV/AIDS activism'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow, I am always impressed with editors who can create articles on the fly like that. Looks good, CoffeeWithMarkets! Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to HIV/AIDS activism as article now exists. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 20:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to HIV/AIDS activism per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Dementia in HIV disease → HIV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The term "demenia" is not present in the target article, leaving the subject of this redirect unexplained. Steel1943 (talk) 06:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as is not at target. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Re-target to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder, which is the modern name for the same subject. WhatamIdoing (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder per WhatamIdoing. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 13:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Craig Harris (journalist) → IGN  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete Not mentioned in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as is not at target. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and fix the article. This redirect happened as a result of an AFD merge/redirect. A couple of months later, an IP repeatedly blanked the target section. WhatamIdoing (talk) 11:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. From what I’m seeing via third-party engines, the subject of this redirect hasn’t worked for IGN since 2010, and has since worked for other notable companies such as SEGA and Apple, Inc.. Disregarding notability concerns and the AfD that resulted in the current redirection, keeping this redirect pointing where it does is rather misleading due to other notable employers this redirect’s subject has had after IGN. In fact, if there was not a previous AfD for this subject already, I’d say that this redirect should be deleted per WP:REDLINK due to the subject of the redirect having a rather stretched-out career as a video game/app journalist with various companies. Steel1943 (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Your welcome → Template:You're welcome  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete No need for this misspelled template. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:CHEAP. This is definitely a common misspelling, and I see no harm in keeping it around. Mz7 (talk) 08:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per demanding perfect spelling is classist, and also per Mz7. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as plausible misspelling. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep plausible misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is one of the few misspellings that is so common that its use in the "Template:" namespace is helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Stereotypes of groups within the United States. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Ethnic stereotypes in American media → Ethnic stereotype  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There is not such a list or subject at the target article. (However, this redirect is a {{R with history}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Stereotypes of groups within the United States, which seems to be a close enough target and does discuss media characterizations. I'm not sure if the history needs to be preserved but retargeting solves that dilemma. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Stereotypes of groups within the United States per Ivanvector. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 20:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Stereotypes of groups within the United States per Ivanvector. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.