The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Dogfoodd → Dog food  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not seen in any notable news articles as that spelling, so it isn't a stylization thing. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as implausable. Or is it Deletee? Legacypac (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Kwispelbier → Dog food#Alternative dog food  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment it's some kind of beer for dogs, made news in 2007, but now it's just some non-notable small business. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no drunk dogs at target. Legacypac (talk) 09:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Tmylm → Tell Me You Love Me  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Acronym not listed at target page. Steel1943 (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Tell Me You Love Me (TV series) the new location of the article at which this has been harmlessly pointing for 10 years. Google hits show that it is the clear primary topic for this acronym and so anyone using it is most likely searching for that article and wont be at all surprised to land there. Thryduulf (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Thryduulf, or else keep as is. The acronym isn't mentioned in the dab or the article, but that's only a problem if there's the potential for confusion or WP:ASTONISHment, which (unless there's another article that could be a plausible target) isn't the case here. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:47, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep at dab. This might be a bit WP:RECENTISM, but I'm seeing a tweet today by Island Records that uses the acronym as a hashtag for Demi Lovato's album: [1] But the TV series still uses it, per this Vulture article. [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep no harm to direct this to the disambiguation page. feminist 08:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Nominator comment: Of the alternative options presented so far, "Keep" seems more helpful per those who commented "keep". Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Westboro Baptist Chipmunks → Westboro Baptist Church  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Non-notable song, not mentioned at target. feminist 16:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable band Lutheran Satire. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above. Thryduulf (talk) 10:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Godlovesfags.com → Westboro Baptist Church  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A blog most likely not affiliated with the church. feminist 16:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per the slogans RFD at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_21#God_Hates_Fag_Enablers_.28etc..29 AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Americaisdoomed.com → Westboro Baptist Church  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Parked domain. Unlikely search term. feminist 16:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per the slogans RFD at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_21#God_Hates_Fag_Enablers_.28etc..29 AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pointless Legacypac (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Abortion. → Abortion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure why anyone would type this in feminist 16:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom as typo in linking. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we always delete these. Legacypac (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. WJBscribe (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Feminosexuality → Feminism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

? feminist 16:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete cause what is that? Legacypac (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not used in any notable news articles. It's used vaguely to refer to Lesbian according to some online dictionaries, but its usage isn't Wikipedia-notable past a neologism on some random blogs AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Feminist views on sexuality As that may be what the searcher is looking for. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  15:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It is discussed in some results in Google Books, and from those sources it appears that the term does not refer to Feminist views on sexuality whether it is a notable concept is outside the scope of RfD, but the current situation is no help. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Justice ministry. Obvious SNOW (non-admin closure) Legacypac (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Dept. of Justice → United States Department of Justice  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Justice ministry, the target of Department of Justice. feminist 16:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Feminist: Is there a reason you brought this here instead of boldly retargeting it? -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Kesha True Colors Tour → Kesha  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Kesha and the Creepies: Fuck the World Tour may be a possible target, but otherwise I can't see how this would be useful. feminist 15:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete She did not have an official tour called True Colors. She performed the song with Zedd at a Coachella festival and that's about it. True Colors (Zedd and Kesha song). Zedd has a True Colors Tour (Zedd) but Kesha wasn't listed as a featured singer. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Army Gals → Steam (software)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Non-WP:N game that just happens to be sold on Steam. Readers would find no useful information about the game at the target article. feminist 15:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable game. Yes, it's on Steam but so what? There are thousands of games. No article for the developer Dharkar Studio either. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Women in the military (where Women in the army redirects). Weak because although this does get use, the non-notable game is by far the primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 23:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Non-notable game. Legacypac (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget and Delete. Consensus is to retarget Middle Man (song) to Middle Man#Music and to delete Middle Man (Iggy Azalea song). The latter action is without prejudice to recreation should the song gain a mention somewhere after it is released. Thryduulf (talk) 11:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Middle Man (song) → Iggy Azalea  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Middle Man (Iggy Azalea song) → Iggy Azalea  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. feminist 15:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of songs recorded by Iggy Azalea and add song to list, or just keep since Draft:Digital Distortion will be moved back into the main space. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Middle man#Music disambiguation. Delete (Iggy Azalea song) until it is listed in the singles or the album. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded the dab to include a bunch of songs titled "Middle Man". AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget/delete as per AngusWOOF. If there is no mention of the redirect at the target what purpose does the redirect serve, save as a confusion? --Richhoncho (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Radiohead: An Illustrated Biography → Radiohead  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I guess this is technically mentioned at the target, but I would have expected an article about a book at this title. feminist 15:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment it's listed at Further reading. I suppose it could be redirected to that section? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I considered doing so, but WP:NOTDIR. feminist 08:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless we have an article that contains substantial information about the book. While the target is an illustrated biography of Radiohead, it is the specific book that searchers will almost certainly be looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 23:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Spook#Songs. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala 13:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Spooks (song) → Radiohead  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Inherent Vice (film), more specific. feminist 15:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Spook#Songs with lots of options there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per AngusWOOF as a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 23:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Radiohead Messageboard, retarget RHMB to Robert Holford Macdowall Bosanquet. Nice catch. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Radiohead Messageboard → Radiohead  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• RHMB → Radiohead  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. feminist 15:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not a directory of fan sites or clubs. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Radiohead Messageboard per nominator as we do not apparently have any article about this messageboard. Thryduulf (talk) 23:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• very weak retarget RHMB to Robert Holford Macdowall Bosanquet. The only encyclopaedic use of the RHMB acronym I could find was related to this scientist and music theorist whose contributions to the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica and A Dictionary of Music and Musicians are designated "R. H. M. B." (see wikisource:Author:Robert Holford Macdowall Bosanquet). Deletion is a close second preference for this redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 23:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Compagnies → Business  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 11#Compagnie. feminist 15:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Your company → Business  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This began as a redirect to a project page. I can't see why anyone would search for this. feminist 15:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as useless Legacypac (talk) 17:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per my original comment on it's talk page "It should be easy to find the wiki policy about editing your own companies page. I haven't found it yet, this vanity page article Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines was the best I could find." Mathiastck (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Your company already exists for that. I don't know how useful it would be to cross this over to the "Wikipedia:" domain. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 20:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Nortel FAST Stacking → Avaya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. feminist 14:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment same discussion as the Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_September_2#Avaya_FAST_Stacking. I did find one article Avaya ERS 5600 Series that expanded upon the acronym briefly. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  18:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Strollers Organization → University of South Dakota  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The word "stroller" or variant is nowhere in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 04:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this is a student organization at University of South Dakota but too local and not Wikipedia notable for its own redirect. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hickory lLeafstem borer moth → Acrobasis angusella  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Please delete. This is not a plausible typo.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  03:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - does not appear to be a feasible typo. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:06, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hinduism in the Falkland Islands → Falkland Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There were 2,840 people in the territory at the last count^[1] and only 2% reported being other than Christian or no religion. That leaves 57 people who might be hindu, or anything else. There is obviously no meaningful hindu community to write about so this redirect should be deleted. Legacypac (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Legacypac (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Could be kept if they had some RS statistics for Hinduism even if it's like a single family or zero, but nope, no data. See similar Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_August_23#Hinduism_in_Easter_Island. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reason to believe that anyone will ever search for this subject. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Similar to the above - can't imagine anyone searching for this. Hchc2009 (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 13:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Philately article banner → Template:WikiProject Philately  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unused. Does not follow any of the standard convetions for WikiProjects. Magioladitis (talk) 20:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't see any reason to keep this as it is unused. ww2censor (talk) 21:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. {{R from move}} in the "Template:" namespace. The redirect is useful for helping those not familiar with the current "version" of "wikispeak" with finding the target template. Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Steel1943, no benefit to deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 00:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Non-tropical/class → Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms/class  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unused. Does not follow any of the standard convetions for WikiProjects. Magioladitis (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete as unused. It was the title of the template for two months back in 2009, but that's probably too long ago to make it pertinent to worry about breaking external links. – Uanfala 21:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since Template:Non-tropical (the redirect's parent page) targets Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms (the target page's parent page). Steel1943 (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WITFstub → Template:WikiProject Espionage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Old and unsed. Magioladitis (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. This is linked from the instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Intelligence/Assessment. – Uanfala 21:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation needed update. I just did. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 07:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. {{R from move}} in the "Template:" namespace. The old name has the potential to direct readers/editors to the proper template. Clarity of a redirect's name is not a definitive requirement for redirects in the "Template:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Foghorn Leghorn and The Barnyard Dawg → Foghorn Leghorn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

WP:XY. Could refer to Foghorn Leghorn or Barnyard Dawg. Steel1943 (talk) 08:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this appears to be an {{R from merge}}. Given that both characters starred in the same cartoons I don't think it unreasonable for people to search for them together, and there is more information about the rivalry between them in the target article than in the Barnyard Dawg article so this is the most helpful target. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, the word "merge" is in an edit summary in the redirect's history, but the redirect contains no edit history, making it a {{R from move}} and not a {{R from merge}} per our current definition of a {{R from merge}}. In fact, here is the edit summary of the first of now 4 edits on the nominated redirect:

    22:57, 7 October 2008‎ Prolog (talk | contribs)‎ . . (29 bytes) (+29)‎ . . (moved Foghorn Leghorn and The Barnyard Dawg to Foghorn Leghorn: per requested move, also merging page histories)

    ...If anything happened here, it was an edit history merge, not a content merge (which is what {{R from merge}} is used for.) Steel1943 (talk) 14:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Classic WP:XY. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Reconsider if this were the name of the collection of shorts, but I don't see that. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Pluto filmography → Pluto (Disney)#Appearances  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Given that Pluto is the article about the current/former planet, this redirect could be considered incorrect or ambiguous. Also, Pluto (Marvel Comics) has also appeared in visual media. Steel1943 (talk) 06:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate if there are multiple Plutos with a filmography, keep if there aren't. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I think the current target is by far the most likely intended target; I find it quite hard to imagine somebody searching for this hoping for a list of films starring the dwarf planet. The Marvel character is more of a possibility, but is much less high-profile than the Disney character, so I think this is best resolved by adding a hatnote ({{redirect}}) for Pluto (Marvel Comics) to Pluto (Disney)#Appearances. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Eager Young Space Cadet → Porky Pig  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Thought Porky Pig is the fiction character who portrays "Eager Young Space Cadet", the character is exclusive to Duck Dodgers, so it would probably be more helpful to retarget the redirect there. In addition, no currently-existing pages that start with "Duck Dodgers" redirect towards Daffy Duck (Duck Dodgers being Daffy Duck's alter ego in the Duck Dodgers series), so retargeting the nominated redirect to Duck Dodgers seems like a more helpful and consistent option. Steel1943 (talk) 06:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep there is very slightly more information about Eager Young Space Cadet in the Duck Dodgers article it is easier to find in the Porky Pig article and the Duck Dodgers article is more prominently linked from the information in the Porky Pig article than vice versa. Thryduulf (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century (the original film) as that's where the character was first attributed. Alternatively List of Duck Dodgers characters#Cadet is a good candidate for the TV series, but that depends on how notable the cartoon is compared to the short. If it redirects to the TV series character list, then a line should be added pointing to the original short. Similarly if it redirects to Porky Pig, then the paragraph with Duck Dodgers in it should be expanded for the original film and its follow-ups prior to the cartoon. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  17:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Paperino → Donald Duck#Italy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure about this one. The redirect is a foreign-language redirect, and currently targets the section where it is mentioned. However, the redirect is essentially a partial title match for the foreign language name "Paolino Paperino". For this reason, this redirect could possibly be misleading for someone attempting to find a different subject named "Paperino". Steel1943 (talk) 04:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment FWIW the the it.wp article about Daffy Duck is at it:Paperino so it seems like this is the primary topic for the word in Italian. Thryduulf (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Because Paperino is also the name of a comic book mentioned in the target section, and because the Italian Donald Duck is different enough from the American version that it is plausible that the Italian name should be used in English to refer to his Italian incarnation, this should be kept. It is not really a partial title match, because the character is generally known mononymously. Gorobay (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget' to Lists of people by net worth#Nationality. Thryduulf (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• List of billionaires by nationality → The World's Billionaires  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The target page does not group billionaires specifically by nationality, not does it guide readers to pages where individual nationality lists can be found. Steel1943 (talk) 01:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Lists of billionaires was previously an article. If that article is restored, this redirect may plausibly target that page. Steel1943 (talk) 01:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I'm personally also uncomfortable with redirecting general terms such as this (and Lists of billionaires) to proprietary terms and branded publications like The World's Billionaires. We don't redirect world records to Guinness World Records, nor music charts to Billboard Hot 100 – to do so would, I think, be a WP:NPOV issue. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Billionaire#Statistics which has some lists of billionaires, at least from four of the major countries, and it has a link to The World's Billionaires, not to mention other starting points for research like List of countries by the number of billionaires AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Lists of people by net worth which I have created from the history of Lists of billionaires and am now updating to include all the nationality lists. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Lists_of_people_by_net_worth#By_nationality. Most plausible destination. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.