Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 April 26
April 26
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Cat with ears turned.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The summary suggests that this file was found on Google, so its source is unclear. However, the licensing claims it is the author's own work (so not Template:Npd). Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 19:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- File:Nasty P in the studio.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says: 'this picture was provided by the photographer to be used as wished'. This suggests that the uploader isn't the photographer, so there is no evidence of any permission. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- User:Azura81 already asked about this image on the media copyright questions page 5 days ago so he already knows that from the posts there. I provided him with the solution to there being no verified permission. See WP:MCQ#Nasty P image question. As stated there, he should get the copyright holder, who is most often the photographer and not the subject of the image, to verify their permission by following the procedure found at WP:CONSENT. It is not that we don't believe the uploader but without verification it is all hearsay and will have to be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 14:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 April 12#File:Vishal BFC.jpeg. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.