Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 September 24
September 24
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Masks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: source author's page and image page clearly shows an "All rights reserved notice which is at variance with the uploader's statement but non-commercial use is not free enough for us either. ww2censor (talk) 03:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fm01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Possibly unfree pre additional text on image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DowntownDavenportSky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Aerial photograph, unlikely to be uploader's own work. Uploader has history of dubious licensing claims (including even a "self" tag on a satellite image) Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Downtowndavenport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Likely copyvio, uploader has a history of bad uploads and made several obvious copyvio uploads of similar photographs around the same time. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ariellah Aflalo by Pixie Vision Productions.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Pixie Vision Productions tearsheet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Ariellah Aflalo by Taboo Media.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged with {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but the summaries say, "Owner has granted written permission to use the image for the article '[article name]' on Wikipedia. Written permission must be obtained from the owner before use or distribution of the image." It sounds as though the copyright holder has not in fact released these images freely to be used for any purpose. —Bkell (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bertie Beetle wrapper.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph of a sweet wrapper, unauthorized derivative work Acather96 (talk) 19:21, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Blueprint Music Factory Single Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo, doubt uploader is copyrighted. Even if he is, this orphaned/unencyclopedic etc. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mukhtar Abbas Naqviji.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image watermark : 'Calcutta Online Nov 28'98' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.