The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:EditorE/Details (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Attack page from now-blocked editor. "This user thinks User:AldezD, User:Acousmana, User:Iridescent, User:Ss112, and User:Gentlecollapse66 should be blocked from editing Wikipedia because they don't really understand the guidelines they cite and just mess up articles even more. They shouldn't be given good faith." AldezD (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. While I'm mystified by my inclusion—I don't recognize the name at all, and looking at EditorE's contributions in the run-up to the offending sentence I can't even see anywhere we might have interacted—this is clearly not an an attack page. We don't delete peoples' userpages just because they're blocked—if someone is really such a shrinking violet that they can't cope with "don't really understand the guidelines they cite and just mess up articles even more" we could at absolutely most reach a consensus to remove that one sentence. ‑ Iridescent 09:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It’s not an attack page. It is not a good idea to delete the pages of blocked editors, doing so creates more damage, such as prompting cries of “censorship” than does doing nothing. Let sleeping dogs lie. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I'm confused, this is all very random. Indifferent really. Acousmana (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per all of the above. OhKayeSierra (talk) 00:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - This appears to be ragpicking. Maybe we need an essay against ragpicking. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think no, Robert. Ragpickers go through the refuse looking for things of value. This activity is more of the opposite. Busywork is my preferred label. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - If problematic, blank with {{inactive userpage blanked}}. If truly an attack page, speedily delete per G10. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 06:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.