The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Despite minimal participation, this MfD has been open for quite some time without objections to removal. Xoloz 21:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Falun Gong/Working Anti-FG (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Falun Gong/Working Anti-FG|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Talk:Falun Gong/Working Pro-FG (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Falun Gong/Working Pro-FG|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Talk:Falun Gong/Working Compromise (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Falun Gong/Working Compromise|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The deletion of the threefive articles for relating to the Falun Gong and Persecution of Falun Gong articles is proposed as being obsolete and having served their purpose. These were attempts to achieve an acceptable consensus in early 2007. Since that time, a considerable amount of work has been done to achieve much more balanced articles which bear little or no resemblance to the article versions proposed here.

Ohconfucius 03:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Persecution of Falun Gong/NPOV version proposed by PRO FalunDafa editors (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Persecution of Falun Gong/NPOV version proposed by PRO FalunDafa editors|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Talk:Persecution of Falun Gong/Working Towards Consensus SectionBySection (edit | [[Talk:Talk:Persecution of Falun Gong/Working Towards Consensus SectionBySection|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

added Ohconfucius 07:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per #User:Victor falk#Segregation_by_country--Victor falk 11:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC) — xaosflux ^Talk 00:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Absent objections, delete. Looks like uncontroversial housekeeping. — xDanielx ^T/_C 07:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.