The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Charles do Vale de Souza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Abandoned draft up for G13 with promising draft note requesting MfD Legacypac (talk) 02:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft delete I think WP:REFUND/G13 is available in this case. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hhhhhkohhhhh: There was a request by Godric on Leave to disclude this page from CSD:G13 and instead make a full MFD nomination on the grounds that it shows interest. Really we should be making GoL defend their request for MFD here (or asking if these reqests should be treated as out of order). Hasteur (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • But I don't think it is a promising draft. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete On the merits of this Draft, barely one sentence for this Football player of questionable notability. Noting that the football club that this player's notability hangs off of does not list him as a member. Hasteur (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not a notable draft. GiantSnowman 13:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.