Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Noctilucent cloud/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Established consensus for keep. All issues resolved. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 15:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Uncited text throughout the article, including entire paragraphs. Citation needed tags in the article since 2021. Z1720 (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I've removed uncited info. How's it look now? I say keep. EF5 13:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep after a quick skim, all issues seem to have been resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I've removed uncited info. How's it look now? I say keep. EF5 13:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.