Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 January 27

January 27

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doctor Who The Twin Dilemma.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DoctorWho42 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Book cover is not the subject of discussion in the article it hails from (The Twin Dilemma) and serves no purpose beyond decorative effect. Image should be deleted due to serving no use in the article beyond decoration. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the novelization was discussed more there'd probably be a case for keeping. But it is not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all articles except Kouprey Whpq (talk) 04:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kouprey at Vincennes Zoo in Paris by Georges Broihanne 1937.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lupo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per WP:NFC#UUI#6 / WP:NFCC#3a, the image should be removed from all articles except Kouprey. — Ирука13 19:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for Kouprey, no opinion about the rest. As the animal is almost certainly extinct and there are very few photos of it, this image is irreplacable for depicting the real animal as it was in life, akin to how we use fair use photos of dead people. Given how old it is, there is little case for commercial use. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:DeepSeek logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Imcdc ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

DeepSeek has published their logo in a GitHub repository that is under the MIT License. While the repo also contains a custom license that does not allow users "to make use of [DeepSeek's] trademarks, trade names, logos," this restriction seems to be related to trademarks rather than copyrights (see also the discussion at Commons). Regardless of the copyright status, this logo could be replaced with the SVG version on GitHub. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep You are misreading/misquoting what is stated. Here's the full quote "Nothing in this License permits You to make use of DeepSeek’ trademarks, trade names, logos or to otherwise suggest endorsement or misrepresent the relationship between the parties...". This is standard trademarking. I can use and state "This is Entity X's Seal", but it is illegal to create a letterhead with said seal and document stating "This is the political position of Entity X". I see no need for additional guidance/caveats. Buffs (talk) 21:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Considering that File:DeepSeek logo.svg was transferred to Commons, there doesn't seem to be a licensing issue here. The PNG should probably be transferred as well, and marked as superseded. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I would concur. Buffs (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]