The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KDKA News.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed to be used to identify KDKA-TV, the image is not in an infobox or at the top of the article. Furthermore, identification is already provided by File:KDKA Logo 2013.png. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. I had tagged this WP:F7 as disputer fair use but that was removed with this explanation which makes no sense. Whpq (talk) 00:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete exceeds WP:NFCCP#3a, not necessary for identification because of the existence/use of File:KDKA Logo 2013.png in the infobox.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails the contextual significance and redundancy points of unfree media. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WPCW 10 PM Open.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed to be used to identify WPCW, the image is not in an infobox or at the top of the article. Furthermore, identification is already provided by File:Pitt The CW.png which is a free file as it is not eligible for copyright. Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFCCP#8 - does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic" (WPCM).  ★  Bigr Tex 02:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 01:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WTAJ News st 11.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Wtaj.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Wtajtv.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Boothy443 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

All of these non-free images are being claimed to beused for identification for WTAJ-TV, however that purpose is being served by File:WTAJ10.png in the infobox. These images are not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 01:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WJAC-former-logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tlonca ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:WJAC Current.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:WJAC2020.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

All of these non-free images are being claimed to beused for identification for WJAC-TV, however that purpose is being served by File:WJAC2016logo.png in the infobox. These images are not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shalhevet Pass.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) 

It's an image of a dead baby used without permission. I don't think the fair use rationale holds. ImTheIP (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WKBN.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed to be used to identify WKBN-TV, the image is not in an infobox or at the top of the article. Furthermore, identification is already provided by File:Wkbn 2012.png which is a free file as it is not eligible for copyright. Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WFMZ 69 News.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tvtonightokc ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed to be used to identify WFMZ-TV, the image is not in an infobox or at the top of the article. Furthermore, identification is already provided by File:WFMZ.png. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 02:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. No prejudice to restoration if someone can provide a citation proving the logo's authenticity -FASTILY 01:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Watm dt3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Strafidlo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free logo is being used for identification WATM-TV along with some other logos. I cannot find any use of the logo at the current site. The logo was uploaded in 2011 so it may have been part of the branding then, but not now. As an identified, this fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 13:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Relicense to pd-logo as it falls below the TOO however if it can't be verified then probably delete. Salavat (talk) 00:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WATM News Open.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed to be used to identify WATM-TV, the image is not in an infobox or at the top of the article. Furthermore, identification is already provided by File:Watm 2009.png. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 13:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 01:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wwcp fox8.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Boothy443 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:WWCP.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

All of these non-free images are being claimed to beused for identification for WWCP-TV, however that purpose is being served by File:Wwcp 2009.png in the infobox. These images are not the subject of significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Textbook violation of WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. No prejudice to restoration if the article(s) these files (specifically this one and those above) are expanded (explicitly and at-length) to discuss the files themselves -FASTILY 01:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:WTOV.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bbabybear02 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is claimed to be used for identification but is not in the infobox and is redundant to the logos already in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All Of these Files that Whpq has put up on this discussion qualifies as fair use because they are only being used to show what the news open for each station is which is a subject of public interest so they should remain. Other Wikipedia Users have been doing this for years throughout the country with other TV station pages from WikiProject Television stations task force. This should be a non issue. If I need to add or make changes to verify this to keep the pictures on the station pages to clarify this. I will make those changes. Bbabybear02 (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to the TV stations task force, please read Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Television stations task force#Use of images in articles carefully. It even states there "All non-free images should be the subject of critical commentary" which is another way of saying that the image use must meet WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which I have done In said articles for years. If Not, Please Explain what I can add to change that. Bbabybear02 (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically is the significant sourced commentary about this image in the WTOV-TV? I'll also point out that the stated purpose is for identification of WTOV which as pointed out in the nomination is redundant to a bunch of images already in the article (which also might be an issue). -- Whpq (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.