The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Fails WP:NFCC#8, no critical commentary in the article(s) these files were used in -FASTILY 07:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:EXO - Call Me Baby SAMPLE.mp3 (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NicklausAU ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:EXO - Mosnter SAMPLE.mp3 (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NicklausAU ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:EXO - Ko Ko Bop SAMPLE.mp3 (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NicklausAU ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The audio samples are used at Exo (band). My attempt to remove them from the band article got reverted, asserting that I should have explained the removal further, so I'll explain better. The usage of the samples must comply with WP:NFCC, especially "contextual significance" (#8). If samples are needed to convey the band's music, then one or two samples would suffice. However, I do not believe that the use of samples in Exo (band) add much understanding to the (boy)band itself. The article content can already convey the band's music without needing the samples, can't it? The brief descriptions about their music should suffice without needing those samples, shouldn't they? The samples may or should belong at, respectively, Call Me Baby, Monster (Exo song), and Ko Ko Bop, but I am uncertain whether using the samples in any article complies with NFCC. --George Ho (talk) 02:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As detailed at the time of upload a couple of years ago, the WP:NFCC criteria justification is contained within each of the file summaries. With respect to criteria 8 in particular, I posit that contextual significance is established as samples of a song's lyrics and musical/vocal style enhances the reader's understanding of the article topic which, in the accompanying paragraph, is the lyrical and musical style of these particular songs in addition to others. NicklausAU 03:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... file descriptions look like one of non-templates copied from other pages, doesn't it? Banners at WP:RATIONALE#Non-template discourage copying "examples" just for shortcut. Rather they encourage (manually) writing their own words. Compare the file descriptions with my own writing at File:The Kelly Song from Cheers episode "The Gift of the Woodi".mp3 without simply copying info from other pages. George Ho (talk) 03:18, 20 April 2020 (UTC); edited, 03:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All file summaries were written using templates as guides, as I had never done it before. While that situation is not perfectly ideal, WP:NFCC criteria are still met. NicklausAU 06:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Additional cited prose needed (otherwise delete) - Somewhat against the norm, these audio clips are better justified in Exo (band) than they are in the articles on the songs themselves. The main test for NFCC #8 compliance is whether the non-free content is the subject of critical (non-trivial) discussion, reflected in properly cited prose. In the main article, the samples are used to illustrate the evolution of the band's style as they shifted from genre to genre. That discussion needs to be copied into the article itself and expanded upon (i.e. it can't just be in the {{Listen}} template). The articles themselves don't appear to explain the significance of the clips - the same information about how the songs represent a change in the band's style over time need to be in cited prose in those articles, and the samples should be brought out of the infobox and put into the section where that prose is, in order to justify their inclusion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 04:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flashback logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gubbidoxxorboxxor ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I can't seem to find anything that can prove the license that was given to the file when it was created in 2007. I guess it must be turned into non-free if proof isn't found. Jonteemil (talk) 06:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Convert to non-free The uploader comments "This image is free to use, but there was no such options to chose in the list." - it appears they don't understand that "free to use" is not a license. So yes, this should be converted to a non-free license and given a FUR. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @The Squirrel Conspiracy: Okay,  Done Jonteemil (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – Jonteemil (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 July 10. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iwantyoubacknsyncgermancd.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Tearinupmyheartgermancd.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Itsgonnabemelimited.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Iwantyoubacknsync.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Tearinupmyheart.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:ItsGonnaBeMe.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 May 3. FASTILY 03:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transnistrian Government campaign stay home, MVD PMR.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Japan.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Anomie ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No need nor sensible purpose in keeping a local copy. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Tagging the image's page failed, as it is protected. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The need and purpose are described in the {{Keep local high-risk}} template on that file's description page. If you don't believe that the practice espoused by the template - maintaining local copies of high usage files to protect against vandalism - is a good one, that's better addressed in an RFC that would apply to all 160 or so images that use that template, rather than just this one file. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per @The Squirrel Conspiracy:. I also suggest ALL national flags have their own local copies since they are also considered as high risk too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MWSS compound (C.P. Garcia Ave., Quezon City)(2019-04-29).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Patrickroque01 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Failed prod. Orphaned image, no encyclopedic use provided. It is a building half obsured by trees. Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete F8 I've moved it to Commons and added it to commons:Category:Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System, as there aren't any shots of the full compound there. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Moyne clock tower back.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Omar qaqish ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Failed Prod as it had been nominted previously. Image is orhaned, low quality, no encylopedic use. Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Link to prior FfD discussion: [1]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celine and Celeb.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hongxiachen ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Failed Prod. Orphaned image and blurry. With regards to the two noted indivduals in the image (first two from the left) , the gentelman has an image in his article but Celine Chen does not. This image is not appropriate for her article and a crop of this out of focus image would be poor. Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family tree of Major Tagalog gods.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JohnMarcelo ( | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Failed Prod due to being previously filed at Ffd. This is orpahend and of no encyclopeid use. Previous FfD was due to conflicting licensing issues not because of non-usage. Link to prior FfD [2] Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 09:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.