Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 28
May 28
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PICT0148.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jtomlinson1967 ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Very low quality image. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Useless image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apparently uploaded to illustrate typical house in Oslon, but quality is too low to be useful. DragonflyDC (talk) 00:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tales back cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Seth Whales ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).
non-free image of the back of an album cover. article already has the front for the "primary means of visual identification" as asserted in the rational and this other image is unnecessary. Does not add significantly to reader's understanding of the article topic - fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Garbage album.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Russgrue ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free album cover that is largely identical to the existing one in the article. The small changes ( text moved, shade a bit lighter) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly harming reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with text and NFCC#8 in that it does not increase reader's understanding significantly. Peripitus (Talk) 12:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GlobalTemperaturesSince1991.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:GlobalTemperaturesSince1991.png listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Obsolete and misleading 58.175.169.160 (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment why is it obsolete, or misleading? 65.94.44.141 (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, no rationale for deletion given. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 06:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Raisens&bunnies.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Caleson ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Derivative work of copyrighted figurines, and no fair use justification for their use provided. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong forum. Uploader claims free use, not fair use; should be brought to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files. DragonflyDC (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]- No, this forum is just fine. There's nothing to discuss about free vs. unfree. This is a derivative work of copyrighted material, without question. I don't need to put this through a two-week-long discussion to determine something that we already know. I am seeking outright deletion of this file, because we all know that it is non-free, and I am laying out my case as to why it is not permitted under fair use. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, thanks. DragonflyDC (talk) 11:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, this forum is just fine. There's nothing to discuss about free vs. unfree. This is a derivative work of copyrighted material, without question. I don't need to put this through a two-week-long discussion to determine something that we already know. I am seeking outright deletion of this file, because we all know that it is non-free, and I am laying out my case as to why it is not permitted under fair use. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Snoop Dogg Sweat remix cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nijinian ( | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphan Supergamer345 (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.