Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 March 1
< February 28 | March 2 > |
---|
March 1
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Trading Places - Family Guy promo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GageSkidmore ( | contribs | uploads).
Non-free screenshot of TV episode that hasn't aired yet. No analytical commentary, apparently random scene, article is a sub-stub with no content in need of support from an image. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gadhama filming.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Arfaz ( | contribs | uploads).
Non-free photograph of a film director, standing on an (unidentified) film set, with several (unidentified) other people from his team, in an undescript situation, talking and pointing to something. Used in the production section of an article about the film in question, but not directely related to any specific statement in the text, and not needed to understand anything in particular about it, hence fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.