The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: move to Commons. New public domain version has been uploaded.--Aervanath (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Einstein in 1915 berllin address book.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bobijin ( | contribs).

• Unencyclopedic, unused. Apparently intended as a primary source that Einstein lived in Berlin in 1915. But no such source is needed, and Wikipedia does not host primary sources. Purports to be pre-1923, but the English language text is dated 25 May 2009. —teb728 t c 00:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment is the republication of free content copyrightable? If not, crop the stuff not from 1915. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 04:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That would fix only one of the problems. It would still be an unused unencyclopedic primary source. —teb728 t c 05:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The tag incorrectly says fair use, but this is not a question of fair use; since it dates from 1915, it's public domain if the surrounding material were eliminated, and therfore can not be deleted as unused unfree. DGG (talk) 03:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was nominated unused unencyclopedic not as unused non-free. Don’t let the pointless non-free use rationale obscure the fact that it has no encyclopedic use. —teb728 t c 03:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/move to commons This image is primarily PD with a little translation and an annotation at the bottom not enough to make it non-free. It certainly has the capacity to be used in an encyclopedic context. — BQZip01 — ^talk 15:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep--Aervanath (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Owen Hunt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Drakesketchit ( | contribs).

• replaceable non-free image. It is possible to take a picture of the actor Kevin McKidd - the only thing here is he is dressed in scrubs. The small difference (hospital scrubs) between a freely created image and this can be described with text alone - fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 00:47, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There is no free equivalent. As an actor, Kevin McKidd owns his own image and thus complies with the non-free image guidelines. In addition to this, the character of Owen Hunt is a copyright by ABC and the character's image is directly related to that article thus if it was possible to gain a free-equivalent, it would bear no relation to the article as this image portrays the actor in-costume as Owen Hunt. Ace 02:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that a free alternate could be created by someone...he is still alive after all. a head-shot of the living person and a shot of him wearing hospital scrubs are not significantly difference in terms of portraying him. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the rationale, then every single character-image that is portrayed by any living actor from Wikipedia must be placed as a candidate for deletion because as you reason, a simple "free" head-shot can replace it. That's not a viable reason to place this image as a candidate for deletion. A free-image head-shot of Kevin McKidd will not accurately portray Kevin McKidd as Owen Hunt in any other context, as the image in question is for the article Owen Hunt, not Kevin McKidd. McKidd in hospital scrubs is the actor in-costume portraying the character; McKidd in any other free-image will not be relevant to the article, thus substantiating the significant difference between this image and a free alternate that someone can create. As it stands, any image of Owen Hunt is a copyright of ABC and any images of that character has no free-equivalent. Ace 03:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The NFCC requires that the use of this (or any non-free image) significantly increase reader's understanding. Sure a free image of him will look different from this one, as would a non-free one of him in character taken at a different time or by a different photographer. However for reader's to understand what the character looks like - a free headshot and the text "in the series he often wears scrubs" with a link to scrubs, conveys ample information that the reader's understanding will not be significantly harmed - Peripitus (Talk) 04:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image does significantly increase the reader's understanding as it portrays Kevin McKidd in character as Owen Hunt that text would not accurately describe. The difference between any free image and any non-free image is that the latter actually portrays Kevin McKidd as Owen Hunt, whether that be in a different time or different photographer or even a screenshot as it was prior to the image re-upload; the image portrays Kevin McKidd as Owen Hunt. Simply having a free-image of Kevin McKidd, which would not be Owen Hunt (as Owen Hunt as a character is a copyright of ABC and thereby any image of Owen Hunt would be a non-free image) would hamper the reader's visual understanding of the character. Having a free-image of Kevin McKidd, not as Owen Hunt, and then a text stating "the character wears scrubs" and having a link to scrubs is an example of synthesis; you can't have extrapolated information such as that as it falls under original research and violates Wikipedia's own guidelines. Having this image within the article already conveys Kevin McKidd as Owen Hunt. The issue here isn't that this image is Kevin McKidd in scrubs, it's Kevin McKidd in-costume portraying the character Owen Hunt, a copyright of ABC, and thus defines it as a non-free image with no free equivalent. This image simply shows the character in full-body and aligns with all the other images uses for the series' characters. Kevin McKidd, as a free-image, would not give ample information to the reader of the visual representation of Owen Hunt due to the fact that any free-image of Kevin McKidd would not be Owen Hunt, but rather of the actor himself as a candid or a photo of the actor that is not relevant to the article or the character. The image's relevance to the article of Owen Hunt is having a visual representation of Owen Hunt, and to accurately convey that, it would require an image of Owen Hunt, portrayed by Kevin McKidd, which is a non-free image. There is no free equivalent for Owen Hunt.

And in regards to the NFCC guidelines to violate the no free equivalency, it requires a yes to either of these two questions:

• "Can this non-free content be replaced by a free version that has the same effect?"

No, because any free-image of Kevin McKidd would not be Owen Hunt and thus does not produce the same effect. The article is in regards to Owen Hunt, and any free-image of the actor that portrays him would not be Owen Hunt.

• "Could the subject be adequately conveyed by text without using the non-free content at all?"

No, to describe Owen Hunt, visually, requires an in-depth detailing by an official credited source by either ABC, Grey's Anatomy writers, and/or Shonda Rhimes and such source does not exist. Any interperation of Owen Hunt in prose-form, not directly from those sources, would be deemed original research and thereby inadmissable by Wikipedia standards.

Since a yes cannot be ascertained with these two questions, the image is thereby deemed a non-free image with no free equivalent and can not be replaced, thereby passing the no-free equivalent criterion set forth by the NFCC. Since no violation has occured, this image SHOULD NOT be a candidate for deletion. Ace 06:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Using this image does not significantly increase readers’ understanding of the article, and its omission would be not detrimental to that understanding. —teb728 t c 19:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does significantly increase the readers' understanding as it visually-presents the character. Its omission would decrease the quality of the article as the reader would not have a visual understanding and recognition of the character. The image itself illustrates the character. The article itself has no mention of the character's physical features or describes the character in any way that the information this image presents. As stated above, there is no text-equivalent for this image, and any attempt to draft one without an official credited source from the show, either by production notes or by the writers or by the actor or by Rhimes herself, would be deemed original research. Such source does not exist, and thereby this image is appropriate and critical for a reader, especially one who is unfamiliar to the series, to identify the character Owen Hunt.Ace 03:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reader understanding doesn't need any image of Owen Hunt; the article would be perfectly understandable without one—just as the Kevin McKidd article is perfectly understandable without an image. Your talk about replacement text is irrelevant. —teb728 t c 06:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Reader understanding would be greatly enhanced, especially for those readers unfamiliar with the series, by the image of the character to clearly identify this character. Character-images are the primary means to identify a character; the omission of this image would hamper the reader's visual-understanding of this character because there is nothing in the article that would allow a reader to quickly identify this character within the scope of the series without any image of Owen Hunt. You can't cite the article of Kevin McKidd as evidence that an omission of an image does not hamper the understanding because that article is assessed a Start class article and no image-upload has been attempted since 2006. Articles such as Khan Noonien Singh, Jack Sparrow, and Martin Keamy are examples with non-free character-images that enhance the knowledge of the reader for identification of this character. In addition, these articles are also featured articles and thereby deemed the very best of Wikipedia. The replacement text is relevant because the very reason this image was incorrectly nominated for deletion was that it supposedly violated NFCC criterion of no-free equivalency. The no-free equivalency criterion is based on a 'yes' to either question posed by the NFCC-guideline. I've shown that the image does not violate that guideline and thereby should not be a candidate for deletion. Additionally, the image meets all 10 of the critera set forth, including policy 8 that requires significance. Omission of the image to the character-article would be detrimental as the reader would have no primary means to identify the character, especially a reader unfamiliar with the series. Since no violation has occurred, the image should be kept. Ace 11:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Pointy nomination. It's appropriate to have a picture to show what a character looks like in the actual series, which is different for example to Kevin McKidd as Vorenus in Rome, or as Tommy in Trainspotting. A photograph of the actor out of character would not be appropriate here. Jheald (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pointy ? ....oooh you're harsh. Just seeing that, unlike say a character dressed up to look like a difference race, species, age or wearing distinctive period clothing, unusual hair style etc...... this photo is just the actor wearing some standard work clothes.....not very different from him wearing anything else - Peripitus (Talk) 00:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The vast difference is that the non-free image IS Owen Hunt. Not simply the actor wearing work clothes, it is the character relevant to the article. Any free-image of Kevin McKidd wearing anything else would not be Owen Hunt. That's the point of how this nomination for deletion is incorrect. Your very reasoning for nomination (it being replaceable by a free-image of Kevin McKidd) and follow-ups makes no relevance to the character of Owen Hunt. The article is not Kevin McKidd; it's Owen Hunt, a copyright by ABC, and thereby any image of Owen Hunt has no free-equivalency. You have failed to provide valid agruments regarding Owen Hunt as a character and an image that reflects Owen Hunt. The very image title itself is Owen Hunt. Basing your nomination that this is replaceable by any other free-image of Kevin McKidd is irrelevant to the application of this image to the article of Owen Hunt. If you look at the image of Jack Shephard, the character is portrayed by Matthew Fox; the non-free rationale of this use is that it describes the character Jack Shephard and not the actor Matthew Fox. The character is in contemporary clothing, like Owen Hunt, because the character is based and used in a contemporary-setting. The same with all the character articles of Lost.The same with Meredith Grey, a character from the same series as Owen Hunt as with all the character articles of Grey's Anatomy. The same with Michael Scott and all the character articles of The Office. The same with Ted Mosby and all the character articles of How I Met Your Mother. All portrayed by living actors. All in contemporary setings. All non-free images. All with no free equivalents. All images of the CHARACTER and not simply any other free-image of the actor that has no relation to the character that they portray.

This image, is not just the actor wearing some standard work clothes, this photo is of OWEN HUNT. This image can be replaced by Owen Hunt in civilian clothing, in scrubs, in his white lab coat, another promotional photo, a screenshot, but it would still be Owen Hunt, and still be a non-free image, with no free equivalent. That's the point. As shown above, there was no violation against the NFCC-criterion. No violation has occurred against Wikipedia policy and thereby this nomination for deletion is incorrect. Ace 03:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Not replaceable by a free image of the actor. Passes all NFCC. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Quadell, et al. — BQZip01 — ^talk 15:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Einer von uns beiden dvd cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stepopen ( | contribs).

• Unneccessary non-free image used simply as decoration. DVD cover in an article about the movie. Fails WP:NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding and WP:NFCC#3a as there is also a similar non-free image in the article Peripitus (Talk) 01:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Blatant and disgusting flaunt of the project's rules. Block this user for ever, at once. Shnitzled (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See this ANI report regarding Shnitzled: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Shnitzled. Regarding delete or not delete, as the original uploader I am also voting for delete. Sorry, still learning about fair use. Stepopen (talk) 06:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Xymmax (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeHayleyMills400.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oanabay04 ( | contribs).

• Image is being used to illustrate discussion of the actress Hayley Mills meeting George Harrison and as a result of the "British Invasion" in the 1960s, was able to enhance her success in the USA. I don't have an issue with the points made but the image does not add substantially to the text. All it shows is the two people sitting together, there is no context and it shows nothing that can't be readily understood simply by the text in the article. It appears decorative. Rossrs (talk) 01:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I wish this issue were as simple as portrayed, but to those readers who have no historical perspective on The Beatles, let alone Hayley Mills, for once, an image is worth a thousand words, and possibly more. In that regard, it is an historic and unique image showing the meeting of two well-known personalities of the time, and in itself transcends a mere text "X met Y in circumstances Z" because it shows both, and although the source of the caption is dubious, it does act to prove that Mills met Harrison. Maybe the text needs work, but interest in The Beatles is such that those they chose to be photographed with, especially those yet to achieve major fame, is of historical interest. I consider that enough to override the presumption against fair-use images in this case. Rodhullandemu 01:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see greater significance in this meeting than in many other celebrity meetings. I'm not lacking historical perspective of Harrison, Mills or The Beatles. I'm quite aware of their relative stature and influence, though Harrison and Mills have no significance together save for this one meeting and this one photograph. If it was, for example, Mick Jagger and Marianne Faithful, I'd see it differently because the connection would have relevance beyond the moment that the photograph was taken. Harrison (and the other Beatles) were photographed with a diverse range of people and I don't know that it would follow that each photograph should be placed into the article of the "other" celebrity. If Mills and Harrison had gone on to work together, or had any significant personal relationship or friendship, I would feel differently. If the event itself had its own significance, again I'd see it differently. This looks like a photo opportunity, one of numerous such occasions that they both participated in, and there's nothing in the photo itself or in the accompanying text to establish that it is more than that. Rossrs (talk) 03:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I've read the article and looked at the picture. As a reader all it gives me is that she met him, I learned nothing else. Both subjects were widely photographed and a free photo of each would adequately replace this non-free one. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mbun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Подпоручикъ ( | contribs).

• Invalid license
• Invalid date - the poster was created on the 50th anniversary of the MPO in 1972 Polibiush (talk) 02:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EC Hallam 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Manticore ( | contribs).

• Unused. — Manticore 02:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:A valid path dualdisc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Entoaggie09 ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (shirt colour, removal of the hat and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ziggy stardust the motion picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dark jedi requiem ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (scaling and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goodieseurodvd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Charmed36 ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is almost identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • What about its usage on Goodies: The Videos & More? Jheald (talk) 19:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Good point - I missed that use. I do note that the rationale for use in either article basically specifies noting about why this image is used, what it achieves or how the NFCC requirements are met. - Peripitus (Talk) 00:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amerie - Touch UK album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is almost identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (orientation and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#3a as multiple non-free images are being used when one would suffice. The alternate cover is nothing more than a mirror image of the original. — Σxplicit 04:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amerie - Touch DualDisc album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is almost identical to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (orientation and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BjorkBigTimeSensualityUSCD.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nekoangel16 ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (colouring largely) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suyl-ukcd2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hotwiki ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (scaling and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suyl-ukpromocd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Frcm1988 ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release album cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (scaling and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oil on canvas japan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dark jedi requiem ( | contribs).

• Alternate album cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (scaling, text and colour) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BS Oops Remixes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cruddytoast ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (colour and text) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Csfa-ukcd2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hotwiki ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (image flipped, background colour changed, rescaled and text added) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turningpointuk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rappingwonders ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences (image cropped, background and text changed ) can easily be described with text alone. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. There is no sourced discussion in the article that requires this image and it's inclusion is simply decorative. Peripitus (Talk) 03:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Aervanath (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reinventing Hell The Best of Pantera Front Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LambOfLucifer ( | contribs).

• Alternate/re-release cover that is very similar to the existing non-free image in the article's lead. The small differences are currently described in the article's text which adequately coveys the differences. As replaceable with a free (text) alternate the image fails WP:NFCC#1. Peripitus (Talk) 03:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wargriders.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dark hyena ( | contribs).

• Used in a gallery, on Warg. Violation of WP:NFC#Non-free image use in galleries. Image not required for reader's understanding of article. FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warg-attack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dark hyena ( | contribs).

• Used in a gallery, on Warg. Violation of WP:NFC#Non-free image use in galleries. Image not required for reader's understanding of article. FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Replaceable free image exists. — Σxplicit 04:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo records copie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gcrec ( | contribs).

• Unencyclopedic, too small, used only in article tagged for A7. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 05:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ctsvidsnap.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Suede67 ( | contribs).

• Image fails WP:NFCC#8. It does not significantly add to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding — Σxplicit 05:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added it to illustrate the end of the video, where the singer rests on the mic. I have written this in the video's description. Suede67 (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZebulonGoertzel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bgoertzel ( | contribs).

• Unused, apparently a personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 16:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rrgs.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dangrayorg ( | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:La quebrada (77).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matteo747 ( | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - image fails WP:NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 04:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dogsbark.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Loodog ( | contribs).

• Derivative work. Rettetast (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Shown in the context of advertisement. Also, original not available.--Loodog (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This is clearly a derivative work of the original advertisement, and thus can only be used on Wikipedia if it satisfies all ten non-free content criteria. It does not seem to me that this image serves to "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" (as required by WP:NFCC#8) in a way that could not be done with freely licensed text (thus running afoul of WP:NFCC#1). —Bkell (talk) 20:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - photo of copyrighted work being used solely to decorate article. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• keep It draws the casual readers attention and improves understanding at a glance —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.92.236.163 (talk) 04:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rizzuto10.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sportskido8 ( | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sendla.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevenup7002 ( | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motron Software Logo White.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevenup7002 ( | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motron Software Logo Black.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevenup7002 ( | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stevenup7002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevenup7002 ( | contribs).

• Unused personal photo, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - no counter argument to the image failing NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 04:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cracktheshutters2.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Suede67 ( | contribs).

• Image fails WP:NFCC#3a as multiple non-free images are being used when one would suffice, and also, or in the alternative, fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding — Σxplicit 19:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added two images, as the Cd and vinyl covers were different. Though I had also added a promo cover, i removed it as per 3(a).Suede67 (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vrahbani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vrahbani ( | contribs).

• Unused personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 20:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monogram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kamranhg ( | contribs).

• Unused, unclear encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete CIreland (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ducktastic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Emerson7 ( | contribs).

• Image is being used to illustrate a comedy duo made up of two living people. As such, it is replaceable by a free image of those two people. I had tagged as replaceable but uploader keeps removing the tag improperly, so listing here for wider discussion. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:27, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: the claim for fair use is made for illustration of the olivier award winning show, ductastic, as is referenced in the article on The Right Size. such usage is permitted by fair use and wikipedia policy. --emerson7 22:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No it's not. Check out our articles on other performers like Adam West. When we're talking about his past roles, we don't put up the logos for Batman or Family Guy, because such uses would be totally decorative. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - they are alive and can still be photographed. Image is replaceable with a free alternate - Peripitus (Talk) 23:47, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image is inappropriate for this article. 172.129.98.125 (talk) 18:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.