The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 04:31, 30 January 2008.

I believe this list meets featured list criteria because it is well-referenced, accurate, and has a strong lead before the list. I have worked on this list extensively, and it is among the first of its kind in the college ranks. It has absolutely no red links, and the prose reads well in my opinion. I hope you all agree with me. Thanks for any and all comments in advance. CrdHwk (talk) 01:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – So no one wants to review this list? I've already made a request for participation at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football (no, I did not ask for support votes, I asked for general participation) and I think I might have to do that again. I know this is still technically day one (or almost day two) but I would really like some feedback on this. I'm not going to let this sit here and die without getting any votes (support or oppose). I'm trying to exercise extreme patience here but this is my first shot at featured for anything so I'm a little anxious to see how it fairs. CrdHwk (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — I've got a few recommendations, but they're nothing that would keep me from supporting this.

• More citations in the lede prose might be a good idea.
• Rather than blank spaces, how about putting "Independent" or "No Conference" for the years that it wasn't in a conference?
• What does WIUFA stand for? It's mentioned in the footnote, but it'd be a good idea to put that information in the lede so a reader doesn't have to scroll all the way down.
• Excellent, excellent use of color. It really helps with the readability.

Overall, this is a fantastic list, and definitely worthy of featured list status. JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. --Golbez (talk) 22:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - nice comprehensive list. AUTiger » talk 06:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.