Jakec (talk · contribs · count) I've been around since August 2012 (I edited as King jakob c from August 2012 to February 2013) and have made over 10,600 edits. In December 2013 I filed an RFA, which was unsuccessful. It would be good to have external opinions on whether I've addressed the opposes and neutrals at my RFA. I'm filing this so soon because I know it takes months to be reviewed and I'd like to have time to take into account any feedback before requesting adminship again. --Jakob (talk) 14:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

   My primary contributions are my content creation. I've created 74 articles (as of April 2014), have 41 DYK credits (again as of April 2014) and have 7 GA credits. So far, the GAs are my best work. They are Chalcogen, Fishing Creek Confederacy, Fishing Creek (North Branch Susquehanna River) (currently at FAC), Nescopeck Creek, Catawissa Creek, David Jewett Waller, Sr., and Mountain Grove Campground. I also have several more articles that are ready for GA, but haven't been reviewed yet.

2. Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.

   See my answer to Q3 on my RFA. It pretty much still applies.

3. What do you want to get out of this editor review? Are you thinking of running for adminship? Would you like feedback on a specific area of your editing? Or would you just like a general review of your edits?

   I'm hoping to run for adminship in early 2015.

Reviews