Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 19

< January 18
January 20 >

January 19

18th-century disasters in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW/WP:OCYEAR. The articles are already in Year in state categories. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

18th and 19th century disasters in Europe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
more nominations
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW/WP:OCYEAR. Manually merge to the century/decade disasters in Europe category to check if the article is already in a country category. Manually merge to the Year disasters category as well to check Year natural disasters, etc. The articles should all already be in YYYY in country as well. –Aidan721 (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Natural disasters by year

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. Merge to disasters tree and decade-level per WP:NARROW/WP:OCYEAR. Manually merge to the decade-level since many of the articles in the YYY0s earthquakes categories. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Beaches by country

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge per WP:NARROW. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Italian mosaic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Mosaics in Italy. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Pluralize name for consistency with categories in general, and, specifically, for consistency with other categories in Category:Mosaics. pburka (talk) 17:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buildings and structures in Newberry Springs, California

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small category for just one building, in a small town without enough other notable buildings to justify it. As always, every town in existence does not automatically get one of these the moment one building in it has a Wikipedia article -- there would need to be several buildings with Wikipedia articles before a dedicated town-level category was warranted, and the county level is all that's needed in the meantime. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Ballet list categories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layers w/ one article each. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:1485 disease outbreaks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
more nominations
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. Merge per WP:NARROW/WP:OCYEAR. Manually merge to the disasters tree when the "by country/continent" structure exists. Many adjacent categories contain the same article(s) that span multiple years/decades. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unsolved murders in Utah

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) SMasonGarrison 13:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We really don't need to diffuse cases by type or crime AND status of investigation SMasonGarrison 13:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind on this one. I found the USA parent that definitely could use the diffusion. SMasonGarrison 13:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Unsolved historical disappearances in Utah

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining/vague SMasonGarrison 13:33, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Resolved missing person cases in Utah

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 27#Category:Resolved missing person cases in Utah

Category:Formerly missing people found dead

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated. Among non-canvassed participants, there is clear consensus to merge the categories. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Recreation of deleted categories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion/Archive_20#h-Category:Missing_people_found_deceased-20240201031600 SMasonGarrison 13:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not sure if G4 applies. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Does a CFD from 2020 still need to apply forever? Do you @Smasongarrison actually have your own argument about deleting these categories (note that the "found alive" category was never even deleted in the first place)? I think having these two separate categories is much more useful than just "Formerly missing people", which is more vague than "they disappeared and were eventually found alive" and "eventually their dead body was found and identified". The ultimate outcome of a former missing person case is an important defining attribute. Why is it not important to distinguish between those who died and those who survived, which are very major differences? AHI-3000 (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just like the previous consensus, which I was also a part of, the intersection still isn't defining. SMasonGarrison 00:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, as I did last time as we don't need to have these separate categories. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimadick, @Nayyn, what do you think about this? AHI-3000 (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it is categories like this that are informative for the reader, pique curiosity and encourage visitors to explore and dig deeper into the site. I'm frustrated about how WP:CAAP#DEFINING is used frequently as a blunt instrument to delete categories that are similarly informative for readers of this site. What is "Defining" often narrowly interpreted by the main characters on CFD, for what goals I'm not sure.
  • For Category:Formerly missing people found dead this is especially relevant because a lot of these individuals fit into WP:BLP1E and WP:N/CA hence the argument that it is not defining is baseless. Merging this category into the proposed makes it a much lesser Wikipedia and would make Category:Formerly missing people unwieldly and less useful.
  • In terms of the argument from a CFD from 2020--- honestly there is no harm to keeping the categories separate as is, only a benefit to readers. Let's make this a better Wikipedia hence WP:WIARM things should develop and grow, rather than keep arguments from the past. I honestly don't see how merging these categories makes Wikipedia better for the actual readers of the site.
Nayyn (talk) 10:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In my opinion, the distinction between missing person cases where the individual was found alive and those that were found dead is a very important one. RadicalUranium (talk) 18:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well-defined and necessary categories. Dividing missing persons cases by their outcome is extremely useful. Dimadick (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ballot measures

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 27#Category:Ballot measures

Category:Queens regnant of Polonnaruwa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Sinhalese queens regnant and Category:Monarchs of Polonnaruwa. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are only two entries in this category, and not likely to be any further, so I think it is small enough to justify merging. Векочел (talk) 12:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Queens regnant of Anuradhapura

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Sinhalese queens regnant and Category:Monarchs of Anuradhapura. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:37, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are only two entries in this category, and not likely to be any further, so I think it is small enough to justify merging. Векочел (talk) 12:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vaporware video games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. However, the overlap was reduced by purging cancelled and released video games. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is a variety of issues that I have with this category: First of all, someone has removed titles that have been released a couple months back like Team Fortress 2 or Duke Nukem Forever. Also, vaporware is only a slang term for software that is takes very long to make and is often simply left abandoned (this may cause confusion with the similar term abandonware). The status of individual games in this category also varies: some are currently in active development and have not confirmed to be cancelled, some are just simply officially cancelled, while others are unreleased unknowingly cancelled. This could actually make for a new Unreleased video games category; which would only include video games that are unreleased yet not known to be officially cancelled. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Split Keep this category (with stricter guidelines) and create a second category for former vaporware that has since been released.
ThanatosApprentice (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus on rename.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • It can be argued that "vaporware" and "development hell" both can refer equally to this phenomenon. Therefore, I support keeping it at the status quo. I also removed Barkley 2, Mega Man Legends 3, and Makai Wars as they were either cancelled or released and it makes sense that this category would be one that is regularly maintained for current vaporware, a defining trait of a notable yet unreleased game. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music generated games

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 27#Category:Music generated games

Virtual reality -> Extended reality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Those categories should cover the broader reality-virtuality continuum, so that's why i'm proposing a mass-rename of several virtual reality-related categories. Especially that the mixed reality market has started booming after Apple's $3499 magnum opus and Meta's first ever consumer-oriented mixed reality headset. However, the case with "Virtual reality pioneers -> Extended reality people" is that they are not exclusively pioneering those technologies but can have various different associations with them. Oh, and, also that there are barely any augmented or mixed reality-related categories. 67.209.128.52 (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Will notify wikiprojects listed by 67.xx IP.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Palestine

Subcategory list
Nominator's rationale: And all sub-categories. Opposed speedy. The country article is now at Palestine as a result of this Requested Moved, the categories for the country should follow. Unfortunately during the years when the Palestine namespace was occupied by a disambiguation page, some category disambiguations were put in and this has led to what should be a straightforward move being procedurally objected to. The category names should match the main article for a country. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of speedy discussion
This should probably go to full discussion. Per WP:C2D: it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose far too many categories to discuss each on their own merits. World Heritage Sites in Palestine for example is too vague when considering the wider geographical region. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if I understand this objection, all of the listed cats include State of Palestine in their titles, for example Category:World Heritage Sites in the State of Palestine. Anything not in SoP/Palestine must be in another state.Selfstudier (talk) 13:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support rename all, logical thing to do. Selfstudier (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Must reflect the change of the main article as the State of Palestine is the formal name of the country and we use common names of countries. Same common names are applied to categories for countries as well. And all bilateral relations articles for the State of Palestine use simply Palestine in the article title. A region known as Palestine can't be too hard to distinguish from the country itself. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Generally support, keeps the category in line with the article. I'm hesitant to blanket support all subcategories in case some do merit further considerations, although at a quick look I can't find any immediate quibbles. If someone could move the "Ambassadors of the State of Palestine to X" categories that would take a decent chunk out. The "State of Palestine-X relations/X-State of Palestine relations" is similarly a big chunk that could be moved without issue. The relations ones appear to already be in the alphabetical order they'd be in if Palestine was used, aside from a couple of exceptions (Category:State of Palestine–Ethiopia relations, Category:State of Palestine–European Union relations) which are probably just errors. Both of these groupings relate solely to the state, so there is no ambiguity issue. CMD (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths from medical malpractice

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge the straight biographies; keeping the "death of..." and other non-biographical articles. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining/inaccurate in most cases. Most of these deaths are from poor medical care, e.g. James Garfield. But these aren't "malpractice" SMasonGarrison 06:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Category will be kept, but no consensus to purge the biographies.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Civil parishes in Telford and Wrekin

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 30#Category:Civil parishes in Telford and Wrekin

Children of Category:1480s in Spain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:09, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Sparsely populated because it's so far in the past. -- Beland (talk) 10:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge After Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_January_7#Category:1488_establishments_in_Spain, four of the five categories will be empty. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Japanese non-binary professional wrestlers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Excessively narrow intersection, especially for just one article. Upmerge sole entry to non-binary professional wrestlers (already present in 21st-century Japanese professional wrestlers so no need there). Not nominating American non-binary professional wrestlers just now but noting that it may be worth doing the same with; if anyone else supports then I'll throw a nom up for it as well. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. I'd take the AMerican ones under the same criterion — we previously merged a host of ethnicity+nationality actors categories on similar WP:NARROWCAT/WP:OCEGRS grounds. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Template:US-aviation-accident-stub

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This template seems to be entirely redundant and unnecessary since its scope is already covered in the much larger Template:Aviation-accident-stub and, out of the current 157 stubs listed at Category:Aviation accident stubs, less than ten involve US aviation accidents/incidents. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: To be fair, every stub sub-category has its scope covered in the larger category, the point of sub-categories is to be more specific. However, there is merit in there being very few U.S. aviation accident stubs compared to the total. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works about economics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, economics is not accurate here because economics is the study of economic topics. Apart from subCategory:Economics books, this category is mainly about economic topics rather than about economics. If there appears to be support for this proposal I will add the subcategories too (but not Category:Economics books). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as distinction without a difference. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because there is no confusion about "Works about economics" and that seems to be what the category contains KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I see no difference in meaning. The study of economies is economics, and books and other works are studies. Any work about an economic topic is therefore an economics work. To me, Category:Works about economics, Category:Works about economies, and Category:Works about economic topics all mean the same thing. I suspect the nominator might be parsing this title very precisely to include only Category:Works examining the study of economics. Perhaps the nominator could provide some examples of included articles which are out of place in the current category and would fit better at the proposed name. pburka (talk) 23:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

1980s/1990s wildfires in North America

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer with just one sub-category. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Wildfires in Canada by year

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This content is better surfaced on the decade-level for Canada. Merge per WP:NARROW/WP:OCYEAR. Several of these articles are about wildfires that spread throughout Canada and the United States. –Aidan721 (talk) 05:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Expatriates from Austria-Hungary in the Kingdom of Serbia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual upmerge for now. There is only one person in this category of two former countries. SMasonGarrison 01:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_January_19