Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 5

< May 4
May 6 >

May 5

Category:Police brutality in Brazil by ex-policemen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. No page left to be merged. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization for a non-defining intersection of traits. We do not otherwise have any scheme of categorizing police brutality by ex-policemen separately from police brutality by current policemen. Bearcat (talk) 23:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Murdered Brazilian politicians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 January 16#Category:Murdered politicians, we do not categorize for the intersection of political career with status as a murder victim. Bearcat (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mega-Sena

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-entry WP:SMALLCAT for a non-defining characteristic. The article filed here is about an event that tangentially happened to involve a former winner of a Brazilian lottery, but the event and the lottery are otherwise unrelated to each other, so the event certainly isn't defined by the participant's incidental status as a past lottery winner. And Category:Caixa Econômica Federal Lotteries will simply be left empty otherwise, since it too was created solely to contain this. Bearcat (talk) 23:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rio Bonito

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-entry WP:SMALLCATs for small municipalities in Brazil. As always, every town that exists does not automatically get one of these the moment one thing with an article has happened there -- there would have to be at least five or six articles to file in each of these before a category for any of them was warranted. For added bonus, the categories were created by an editor who's been on a royal rampage of bad overcategorization with a few dozen bad, misnamed, misconceived and/or duplicate categories created just in the past few days alone. Bearcat (talk) 23:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canadian model stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated stub category. Unlike the Australian model stubs category below, this one was approved by WikiProject stub sorting back in 2008 -- however, while it purportedly had 60 articles at that time, it now only has 19, and neither Category:Model stubs nor Category:Canadian people stubs offer up anybody else who could be refiled here to repopulate it. So it was a good faith creation at the time, but it's no longer needed for the small number of people who are still here 15 years later. Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian model stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated stub category with no evidence of approval by Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting. As always, stub categories are not free for just any random user to create on a whim: there have to be 60 articles to populate a stub category before it becomes warranted, below that a stub template should just sort pages into parent categories instead of being paired with their own dedicated categories, and because there's a minimum size requirement stub categories have to be approved for creation. But there are only 16 articles here even after a scan through Category:Model stubs for prodigal Australians, and there's no evidence that this was ever approved by the stub sorting project. Bearcat (talk) 21:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Emigrants from the United Kingdom to Portuguese Mozambique

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: double merge per Oculi. – Fayenatic London 20:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: procedural nomination, stale discussion at WP:CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
copy of speedy discussion
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Treasure hunt television series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 00:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: procedural nomination, stale discussion at WP:CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
copy of speedy discussion
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Maccabi Ironi Tamra F.C. players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep per RM outcome at Talk:Maccabi_Ironi_Tamra_F.C.#Requested_move_8_May_2023. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: procedural nomination, stale discussion at WP:CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
copy of speedy discussion
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Supporters of the Aryan idea

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 21#Category:Supporters of the Aryan idea

Category:Shukuyodo deities

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, not a defining characteristic of the articles in this category. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Low Countries newspaper publishers, pre-1795 (people)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, only two articles, of people from two different countries that split up when they were born. No need to merge, they are already in Category:17th-century newspaper publishers (people). Marcocapelle (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canada's Got Talent judges

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is just a WP:PERFCAT. A judge on a TV series is not WP:DEFINING. --woodensuperman 13:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Earth mysteries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is meant for "Earth mysteries", which are locations connected to certain spiritual beliefs, but the term is so seldom used and poorly defined that it's not really a viable category. Before I cleaned it up, this was used as sort of a catch-all for unexplained phenomena, but there's no good reason to maintain a separate category from Category:Unexplained phenomena. –dlthewave ☎ 12:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dual internationalists (football)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 21#Category:Dual internationalists (football)

Category:Shprefeja players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No evidence that Shprefeja club is notable. No reliable information can be easily found, and it has no article. Geregen2 (talk) 02:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Floods by country

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT. Do not need to merge to continent level except where listed above since articles are in yearly or decade continent categories. Some merging will need to be manual since the articles are also categorized under earthquakes or landslides. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Royal houses of the Netherlands

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 21#Category:Royal houses of the Netherlands

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_5