Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 6

< May 5 May 7 >

May 6

Category:Paco Paco songs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete; could be re-created if Paco Paco is created. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Artist is a redlink. Only one category. No assistance to navigation. Richhoncho (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle: Thanks for your comment, my nomination is not based on whether there is an article for the band, but whether the category is any use for navigation. If there had been two members of any description I would not have nominated, if somebody wants to create an article for the artist, I am fine with that too, but click on a category to find it is a dead end does seem to be against the spirit of categories. --Richhoncho (talk) 07:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rede Globo affiliates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as below. – Fayenatic London 07:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per pending main article move Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rede Globo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per renamed article. – Fayenatic London 07:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per pending main article move Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Esuvii

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Another category (cf. 20 March 2020, 6 December 2020) which mixes up a supposed Roman family/gens with an obscure tribe of Gauls. It may or may not be a coincidence that the two Romans listed here, both called Esuvius Tetricus, were also from Gaul (were they named after the Gallic tribe?), but, in any case, the Romans and the Gauls would have to be split into two separate categories. And there's not enough of either to form one which would not fall under WP:SMALLCAT. Avilich (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets councillors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets was a short-lived party and has now dissolved. It had 6 councillors during its existence, but only 1 of these has ever been notable and in possession of an article. Bondegezou (talk) 11:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets was a short-lived party that only had one leader in its existence and has now dissolved, so there's no point in having a category. Bondegezou (talk) 11:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Honorary Degree Recipients of Fu Jen Catholic University

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining award. Not mentioned in three bios checked at random. Honorary degrees don't seem to be defining, hardly ever. (t · c) buidhe 07:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Summiters of Mount Kinabalu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEFINING: Mount Kinabalu states you don't even need mountaineering equipment to reach the summit. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Geisler family(Philippines)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 08:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Terrible disambiguation —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed to renaming--Jondel (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Enrile family(Philippines)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 08:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Terrible disambiguation —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed to renaming--Jondel (talk) 13:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cimbalomists by nationality and 1 subcategory

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 14#Category:Cimbalomists by nationality and 1 subcategory

Category:Rogers TV

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Category:Rogers TV

Category:Rogers TV original programming

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Category:Rogers TV original programming

Category:Order of Sikatuna

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is the "national order of diplomatic merit of the Republic of the Philippines... [awarded to] diplomats, officials and nationals of foreign states"—i.e. it's mostly a diplomatic souvenir. Although it's also awarded to Filipino diplomats, none of the articles I checked more than mentioned the award. (t · c) buidhe 03:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Honorary Commanders of the Order of the Defender of the Realm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The honorary version of this award is a Malaysian diplomatic souvenir. Nominating separately from the substantive award as while I don't expect it is defining either, it should be easier to get consensus for this deletion. (t · c) buidhe 03:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Members of COVID-19 advisory groups

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete all. – Fayenatic London 22:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:White House Coronavirus Task Force
Nominator's rationale: The category contains only members of the task force (and White House Coronavirus Task Force). The members are also listed in White House Coronavirus Task Force so a category may be unnecessary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Independent SAGE
Nominator's rationale: The category contains only members of the group (and Independent SAGE). The members are also listed in Independent SAGE so a category may be unnecessary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Combine I would favor a single solution for these, whether I agree with that outcome or not. - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unless these groups last a long time and so have lots of members I think the lists in the articles should be sufficient. Rathfelder (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- This relates to a self-appointed group who came together to oppose (or criticise) what the government SAGE committee was doing. I have not herd them mentioned on the news for many months. I would therefore suggest that this is a NN committee, even if it still exists (does it?). I am not objecting to the existence of an article, but the category comes close to being a PERFCAT. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:COVID-19 Immunity Task Force
Nominator's rationale: The category contains only members of the task force (and COVID-19 Immunity Task Force). The members are also listed in COVID-19 Immunity Task Force so a category may be unnecessary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:COVID-19 Advisory Board
Nominator's rationale: The category contains only members of the board (and COVID-19 Advisory Board.) The members are also listed in COVID-19 Advisory Board, so the category may be unnecessary. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of Abdulaziz al Saud

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Nondefining Saudi award. On both arwiki and enwiki, awarded primarily to Al Saud family and foreign dignitaries. These people are notable for their position, not receiving this award. (t · c) buidhe 03:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Honorary Degree Recipients of the University of London

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Judging from Category:Honorary degrees, there seems to be consensus for keeping honorary degrees in lists rather than categories. I see no indication that ULondon honorary degrees are defining, certainly not for Amartya Sen, Joseph Lister, or Margrethe II of Denmark. (t · c) buidhe 02:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Star of Jordan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Mostly awarded to foreign dignitaries, to members of the Jordanian royal family, and to high-ranking Jordanian politicians (such as the prime minister). Either way, recipients are notable for their position not for receiving this award. I checked arwiki and it tells the same story. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the Boston Club

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:TRIVIALCAT
Despite its name, The Boston Club is a private gentlemen's club in New Orleans, Louisiana. It does carry some old money prestige but it tends to admit prominent people who are not defined by it. Of the 10 articles in this category, 7 don't mention this at all and 3 mention it in passing (1, 2, 3) but each of those were officers or founders not just members. The category contents are already listified right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former member states of the European Union

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT
The only article in this category is the United Kingdom and there is no growth potential. We have a whole category tree for Category:Withdrawal from the European Union with a Category:Brexit subcategory to hold articles for readers interested in this topic. Going from the UK article to a category with no other articles does not aid navigation for readers. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just meant there are no other Wikipedia articles that could be added right now; if the situation changes on the ground we can of course re-evaluate this category. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_6