Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 6

February 6

Category:Bromeliaceae species

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Given that the comment advocating listifying before deletion specified that once the pages were properly categorized the list "can probably also be deleted", and given Hyperik's response below, I don't think a full list in mainspace is needed, but I have pasted a list of all pages currently in the category on the talk page. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WikiProject Plants doesn't categorize articles by rank species. The lowest rank we use is genus. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Categorization#Taxonomic rank categories for more details. — Hyperik talk 21:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete none of the Tree of Life subprojects categorize by species rank. Plantdrew (talk) 22:44, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Listify then delete - A category with 922 members is too big to be a useful navigation tool. There at at least 30 genera, which is the appropriate level to have categories at. I am suggesting listifying rather than deletion to provide a mechanism for distributing over 900 articles into categories for genera. When that has been done the lit can probably also be deleted. A plain deletion is liable to destroy useful data. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did a lot of spot checking before the nom and every article I had checked was already placed in its appropriate taxonomic category. —Hyperik talk 04:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fossil taxa of Europe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 20:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These appear (at least which articles they could include) to be the same thing. Consistency with other continents. DexDor (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For info: Of the 6 previous editors of the category 4 (including the creator) are now blocked. DexDor (talk) 21:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why delete rather than merge? DexDor (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't thinking clearly, changed to merge. Plantdrew (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Clergy in Ireland

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Religious leaders in Ireland. In this case there is already an intermediate Category:Christian religious leaders in Ireland so I will leave the contents in that one. – Fayenatic London 07:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only content is Category:Christian clergy in Ireland Rathfelder (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge - This is a one item category, which constitutes an unnecessary category level. Clergy tends to refer to Christian ones. Those of other religions can satisfactorily be placed in the religious leaders parent. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian subscription television series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category is not really a defining category for a TV series. It's located only in Category:Australian television series by network, which itself has the same network categories. Despite being created in 2009, there aren't any other countries that have this category, which means that other editors don't find this sort of categorization useful either. Gonnym (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Bahnsport-Info

Kostenfrei
Ansehen