The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Ha*Ash members to Category:Ha*Ash

Nominator's rationale: Per Category:Musicians by band, don't create a member category when only one member of the band has an article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 16:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Health user templates to Category:Health and fitness user templates

Nominator's rationale: 1) Broaden the category; 2) Consistency with parent Category:Health and fitness templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:59, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Support not a bad idea.Catfurball (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, fitness is a very distinct aspect of health. Suggest creating Category:Fitness user templates instead - if it can be populated at all. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Support for consistency with Category:Health and fitness templates. If there is enough content to justify Category:Fitness user templates, we can always create a subcategory in the future. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 18:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: do not merge. MER-C 16:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Cryonics organizations in the United States to Category:Cryonics organizations

Nominator's rationale: There are only five articles in this category, and only two in the target (parent) category, one of which is US headquartered.

With a total of only seven companies worldwide, geographical categorization is WP:OVERCAT. Guy (Help!) 12:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I cant see the merit of this. It seems a good idea that these organisations should be linked into Category:Medical and health organizations based in the United States, and it seems quite likely that there will be further articles in these categories.Rathfelder (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• If merged, at least dual merge to both parent categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• It wouldnt be helpful to just merge them into Medical and health organizations. They are very fundamentally different. Rathfelder (talk) 07:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Rathfelder. – Fayenatic London 13:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Rathfelder. Dimadick (talk) 10:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no further action required (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 18:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is the correct place to do this but I would like to nominate a new category to be created: "Category:Bookstores of Nepal". There are currently at least three Wikipedia pages about bookstores in Nepal: Pilgrims Book House, Ratna Pustak Bhandar and Quixote's Cove. There are other quality bookstores in Nepal (e.g. Himal Books, Kathmandu; Mandala Book Point, Kathmandu) and thus more possible Wikipedia pages to be created. A category "Category:Bookstores of Nepal" would match the many other "bookstores by country" categories such as "Category:Bookstores of India", "Category:Bookstores of the Philippines", "Category:Bookstores of Thailand", "Category:Bookstores of Japan", etc.--Perseus25 (talk) 09:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• You dont need permission to create new categories. Just be bold and do it! Rathfelder (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, Rathfelder. I have now successfully created the new category, Category:Bookstores of Nepal, but, before doing that, I mistakenly created a new and incorrect category, Category:Bookstores in Nepal which I am now unsuccessfully trying to delete (using the "How to move a category" instructions in Wikipedia's Help pages). Could anyone please assist in deleting "Category:Bookstores in Nepal"? Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience.--Perseus25 (talk) 21:46, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• You learn from your mistakes. I hope! Rathfelder (talk) 06:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks again, Rathfelder. Yes, I am definitely learning about categories and quickly!--Perseus25 (talk) 06:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Bookstores in Nepal has been tagged as empty now, so the page will disappear in 7 days. Another possibility for having your own page creation deleted is tagging the page with {{Db-self}}, then it will be deleted the same day. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks very much for your action, Marcocapelle and for your advice which I have noted down for my future reference.--Perseus25 (talk) 06:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.