The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: What's the distinction between this and its parent, Category:Crime films based on actual events? The scope note for this one even says "Films based on actual crimes." Maybe there's a fine distinction we could draw, but shouldn't we just merge these? "True crime films" might make for a more recognizable name, but I'd be fine with an upmerge as well. BDD (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or upmerge: "Crime films based on actual events" seems like the more accurately named category. I would support such an upmerge in particular but any sort of merge would be preferable to the current duplicate category situation. --Nicholas0 (talk) 17:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Moon in film
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. It may be helpful to create the proposed category as a sub-category of the existing one; Apollo 13 notably features the moon in film, even though it's not set on the moon (or fictional). – FayenaticLondon09:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category is intended for "films...set on the Moon" per its description, so the proposed category name would be more clear and accurate, and there are many "Film set in/on..." categories that exist as precedent for this rename. DonIago (talk) 17:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Foreign Legion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate. I do not see anything in this category that could not better belong to the parent target category, most entries being already duplicated. Note that content specific to a unit called exactly Foreign Legion is already found separately at French Foreign Legion. Place Clichy (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- Foreign Legion normally means the French one. The rest of a hotchpotch of units serving permanently somewhere other than their native country. In that respect one might at Kings German Legion and medieval Scots fighting for the French in the 100 years war. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung
