The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Digimon. Shimeru (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zurumon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is entirely in-universe. No content on real-world impact. No references at all. A Google search reveals no news or scholar hits, and the two book hits are utterly trivial mentions. A web search gets lots of hits, but most seem to be fansites, fora, or blogs, i.e. not reliable sources. The few that might be RS seem to have only trivial, entry-in-a-directory level mentions. As per WP:FICT not every plot element of a fiction need have a separate page. DES ^(talk) 17:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC) DES ^(talk) 17:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per my nom unless multiple reliable sources with significant discussion and analysis, and info on real-world impact is found. Note this has been tagged as having notability problems for 6 months. DES ^(talk) 17:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to an appropriate list. Edward321 (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.