The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zum zum zum n° 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability.

PROD removed with no improvements. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Italy. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — poorly received sequel of the Corbucci-Little Tony 69 musical, notable as such. — MY OH MY! 08:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as above, I also added a couple of reviews from two books I own. Cavarrone 20:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as three reviews of the film in reliable book sources have been added to the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.