The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 02:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ZEGG (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC. Non notable band. The review was from one indy music site. Not notable. Delete Undeath (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep. Relix Magazine is not an indy music site, it is a large-circulation glossy color monthly magazine. They manufactured 100,000 Zegg single CDs and shipped them with the magazine - no small task. Furthermore, this article has a conscientious editor supporting and tending to it. Deletionism is lame. --AStanhope (talk) 08:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The Relix mag was not what I was talking about when I said the review was from an indy music site. I was talking about the review of the album. Look at the external links. Undeath (talk) 12:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Sounds like we should close the deletion discussion then and call it a keep. --AStanhope (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tipstaa (talk • contribs) 13:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrJollyMan (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.