The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yerm Lunar Calendar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable, no sources Jc3s5h (talk) 18:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Even though mention was made back on March 8 in the article's talk page that the article was not notable, no sources have been provided and nothing else has been done to indicate the topic is notable. --Jc3s5h (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indications of notability. Edward321 (talk)
• Delete - no sourcing for notability. Note that a wikipedia editor claiming to be the inventor of the calendar has weighed in on the talk page for the articel agreeing that the calendar is not notable. -- Whpq (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.