Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A redirect can be editorially created. Sandstein 11:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable firm; I can find no significant in depth press or academic sources about them. Not sure the merger of them with a Canadian firm helped with that. Isingness (talk) 06:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 10:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable. Existed less than 2 years. All references are either from firm's own website or press release noise.--Rpclod (talk) 17:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gowling WLG, the firm with which it merged. Normal practice is to make the article for the final entity, with redirects from earler parts, unlss the earlier parts are much better known. DGG ( talk ) 08:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is not (actually "is not suppose to be") a yellow page advertising (world business directory) vehicle. This "old" company has zero WP:notability of any historical nature. Since it merged it no longer exists right? ---- I cannot see support of merging one non-existant yellow page listing for another 2016 yellow page listing that is not notable. Otr500 (talk) 09:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.