The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wonraw Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was PRODded, deleted after PROD expired, and immediately recreated. Unsourced, I was not able to easily find sources different from maps/GeoNames. Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails basic notability guidelines as the PRODer of this article. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 13:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is a 55 miles (89 km) long road, and asserted to be the most important road in a not-insubstantial area of Myanmar, so it is in effect a highway probably equivalent to a state or interstate highway in the United States. Avoid U.S./U.K. bias. --doncram 04:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  @Doncram:, I am perfectly fine with what you write, but do you have non-map sources to confirm this? I was looking exactly for these sources and was not able to find any.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as failure of WP:V. I'd vote weak keep per Wikipedia:Notability_(geographic_features)#Roadways and User:doncram's argument, but I couldn't find any source that would allow even so little as confirm this is not a WP:HOAX. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.