The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 01:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What It Means to Be Defeated (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The articles fails WP:NALBUM. It does have references, the most notable could be Infectious Magazine [1], announcing their tour and about 17 words about the album. Other notable reference could be Metalinsider [2], but 2 lines about the album does not make it notable (yet). Should be redirected to Dayseeker. Karlhard (talk) 14:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of album articles which only consists out of at least two or three sentences and don't have any references (for example Above the City or Behind the Mountains). Why we should keep them? I looked up some references for that article and it is going to be deleted because the references aren't notable enough? --Goroth (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Above the City has a billboard article [3]. as per Behind the Mountains [4] [5] [6]. Should I continue? This article does not address any notability as a musical recordings. This should be strongly deleted or redirected to Dayseeker. --Karlhard (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They may have articles in Billboard or similar magazines but no one is linked in the articles. What It Means to Be Defeated has reviews in New Noise Magazine, Smag Magazine, Punktastic, here are some articles about What It Means To Be Defeated, Top40 Charts and Rockfreaks. Notable sourches enough? --Goroth (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles are not notable enough, most of them are press release. Could not even stablish the notability of the article. Let's wait the feedback from other contributors. Karlhard (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per the sources brought up here. Sources like the Rockfreaks and New Noise Magazine ones are reviews, not press releases. Also, here's the correct link to the Punktastic source, which is also a review. Kokoro20 (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there are references available which aren't promotion for the album. --Goroth (talk) 15:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.