The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Verdo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this supposed settlement exists. Fails WP:CRYSTAL; most sources cited do not mention "Verdo" by name. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It exists (or will), but it's a housing development with pure puffery of calling themselves a neighborhood or settlement. Not seeing notability for this real estate spam. Reywas92^Talk 01:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as South China Morning Post-friendly spam; most of the article relies on inherited notability, such as Kew Bridge station...which was there 170 years sooner. ——SN54129 16:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Run of the mill housing development, nothing to suggest it has any special attributes which give it notability. Neiltonks (talk) 18:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable housing development. –dlthewave ☎ 16:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This appears to be just the promotional name of a new housing development, not an actual place name. MarkSG (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --KartikeyaS (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable and clearly promotional in nature. ~riley (talk) 07:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:GNG, WP:MILL, WP:SIGCOV, WP:SPAM, and my own standards. No clear notability. It seems to be a run of the mill newly-built housing estate. There are tens of thousands in England alone, and we can't list every one. The sources are sketchy. It is written as a real estate ad, not an article. This fails my standards - there's no evidence it even has 4,000 inhabitants, and is smaller than some barangays in Manila, each of which elects its own mayor. Bearian (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.