Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulf Abrahamson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Assertions that sources exist are meaningless. Identifying specific sources is what counts. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ulf Abrahamson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No real sources or indication of notability Jac16888 Talk 22:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment, checked swedish wiki here, unfortunately no additional sources listed there, in fact, this looks like a direct copy, Vannucci, translation tag required? Coolabahapple (talk) 07:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. This artist might be notable locally, but I found zero Google hits in news, newspapers, or books. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete GNG requires multiple sources, there is 1, I am not sure it fits other GNG requirements, but it is not multiple.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The Svenska konstnärer. Biografisk handbok that is cited is available online at http://runeberg.org/svekonst80/ It mentions several people with the last name Abrahamsson, but no Abrahamson, and none named Ulf. However, a google search for "Ulf Abrahamsson" konstnär yields some results. Perhaps his name wasn't spelled correctly? Mduvekot (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - the Delete !votes above are based on the notion of a bad shape article. such things can be improved. also sources, there are plenty of sources available.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- BabbaQ if you have sources, please provide them. I have been unable to find anything that would support a claim to notability. Mduvekot (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- At the risk of repeating myself, I tried to find sources and found nothing. FWIW, I have a sister-in-law from Kiruna, Sweden. Bearian (talk) 00:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - My searches did not turn up anything which would show they pass WP:GNG. If someone comes up with some in-depth coverage, be more than happy to change my !vote. Onel5969 TT me 20:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I have not been able to find any independent, reliable sources.Mduvekot (talk) 21:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No independent sources at all - the source in the article is a directory that gives only a few lines to each entry and does not cover subjects "in detail", as required for GNG. Also, no indication it would qualify under WP:ARTIST. Note that most sources (that are all trivial mentions) refer to him as Abrahamson, but some use Abrahamsson (e.g., what I presume was used for the date of birth), so might not even be about the same person. No longer a penguin (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.