The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Buzz Lightyear of Star Command. History retained if editors want to add stuff into Buzz Lightyear of Star Command. Cirt (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ty Parsec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 14:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 14:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Minor character, most of the content is episode synopses. treelo _radda 14:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Does not seem sufficiently important for this elaborate treatment, and the description in the main article Buzz Lightyear of Star Command appears sufficient. Thus a redirect, not a delete, is what is appropriate. DGG (talk) 15:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N. Eusebeus (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as per DGG. Edward321 (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.