The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect. Daniel (talk) 03:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TuxNES (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article fails to establish notability (WP:N) and does not cite any sources, let alone reliable ones (WP:RS). Discontinued software for seven years, so this is unlikely to ever change. The muramasa (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If it had links/references outside of it's download page at sourceforge, or was more active, I might consider saying Keep, but it doesn't seem notable as is right now. Addionne (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. The muramasa (The muramasa) 18:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Nintendo Entertainment System emulators. Protonk (talk) 16:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article does not make a convincing case for notability and the project appears to be largely outdated and abandoned, meaning it doesn't stand to gain any notability either, and also being as such it's of minimal usefulness to readers. WP:SAL discourages the inclusion of non-notable items in a list article, hence I am reluctant to merge/redirect. That said, the current list needs some serious pruning. (Apologies for using boilerplate comment.) Ham Pastrami (talk) 23:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.