The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:08, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsunami (Manic Street Preachers song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The UK charting seems to be the only thing qualifying this as notable, and I don't believe that that on its own is enough. Lachlan Foley (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I've found two in-depth sources on the song through a Google search, one by NME and one by The Guardian. I think these are enough to pass WP:GNG or WP:NSONGS. Kokoro20 (talk) 05:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:NSONG - "1.Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts". If the nom doesn't think this is enough to pass notability, then they should raise a RFC. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - charted, multiple sources available ==> meets notability criteria. Rlendog (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.