The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transmetal 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a grouping of characters that fails to establish notability as a group. There is no need for an article at this time. TTN (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of real-world notability and not a single source cited. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nothing suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. — Music1201 ^talk 01:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. JumpiMaus (talk) 16:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.