The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Austwick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cricketer non-notable per WP:CRIC. It states that for a cricketer to be notable he has to have played first-class, List-A or Twenty20 matches. Austwick plays Minor Counties cricket, which per WP:CRIC are non-notable matches as they don't hold any of the above statuses, therefore Austwick is a non-notable cricketer. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No problem with that. --S.G.^(GH) _ping! 17:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm convinced VASterling (talk) 01:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I could only find passing mentions in match reports and scorecards. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 02:47, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.