The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 11:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No the result is 8 Keep to 8 Merge .. this is a clear No consensus vote, as such it should be immediately relisted.  ALKIVAR™ 16:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Tinkerbell the dog is not a notable figure. dryguy 17:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Paris Hilton. Tinkerbell is not a notable enough individual in and of herself. Extraordinary Machine 17:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Paris Hilton. And no creating an article for Britney Spears's dog Bitbit either! --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 18:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Paris Hilton. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• mg with Paris Hilton or Butters Stotch Sceptre ^(Talk) 19:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep - Much as I despise myself for this, see the Talk:Tinkerbell (dog) page, plus the fact that this animal has a bigger IMDB entry than many actors on wikipedia. MNewnham 20:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Paris Hilton as per Extraordinary Machine. Sliggy 21:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I want to cut myself for keeping something like this. I feel, however, that the dog is notable enough to merit its own article, seeing as articles do exist for a number of "celebrity" animals and, either way, there's more information on this dog than many actors and actresses themselves. -Rebelguys2 22:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with paris hilton... look this is not Lassie, Mister Ed or Flipper we're talking about here... there is no television series to which this dog is a star... this dog merely was with paris hilton frequently. Would a pair of Paris Hilton's shoes be given an article? They've been just as photographed/filmed.  ALKIVAR™ 23:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • That depends: Did she keep her shoes on while filming the sex tapes? Barno 17:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per discussion at Talk:Tinkerbell (dog). --Malthusian (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Paris Hilton. --Terence Ong ^Talk 14:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep alone notable dog.  Grue  20:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I figure this way, the cosmos will allow me to vote delete on the next million articles I see. (Seriously though, keep.) Melchoir 20:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Paris Hilton. I have much to say on the matter, but corporate NDAs keep me from talking specifically about this dog. --Paraphelion 01:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Why merge to Paris Hilton, Paris Hilton is not Tinkerbell.--Hotwiki 07:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Dog has published a book, made ph famous for being a bad dog owner, appeared in South Park for pete's sake, this dog seems to be pretty close to as worthy of an article as, say, Millie. I was doubtful when I first saw this, but I went browsing and sure enough she's everywhere. Elf | Talk 00:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, for now. May become less notable over time. --SarekOfVulcan 19:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.