The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bergvliet and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Valley Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school. My attempts at redirects and speedy deletions keep getting reverted. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 07:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Primary schools are not generally notable, and the article does not demonstrate any special notability for this school. - htonl (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not appear to satisfy WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect. Convention with schools such as this one is, as I understand it, that they do not generally warrant a stand-alone article. Appears to be non-notable, given the lack of substantial multiple coverage in RSs in gnews and gbooks. It does exist, and has run-of-the-mill coverage as reflected in its 3 gnews hits, but that does not suffice.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.