The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus; I don't think, don't think, TNT, just an observation. No formidable rationales are presented here, and due to that the article could possibly be renominated. We want some good reasons here at AfD, presenting notability guidelines and not opinions, 'I think', etc.. (non-admin closure) J947^(c) 01:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Definitely not in compliance with WP:RAWDATA. Nuke it, and start over so the article can be remade as a more encyclopedic entry. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 10:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The other "33 seasons" were IP vandalism; undid that, leaving the one actual season. 62.219.99.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has a history of loading Survivor pages with gobs of cruft (to the point it took me minutes to execute said undo). Nate • (chatter) 18:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mrschimpf Can you find any other reliable sources to support the article? It is relying too heavily on primary sources. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 00:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I don't think deletion (via WP:TNT) is the correct approach to dealing with article consistency or other issues. Whatever appears unsourced or unverifiable can just be removed by itself. Mar4d (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete - I found a contemporaneous source [1] which is enough to convince me this is not purely a work of fiction. I still don't think it's notable, though. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.