The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Reddy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. All sources provided are primary. I searched for sources with search ["Suresh Reddy" ambassador] and could not find anything indepth. LibStar (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, India, and Brazil. LibStar (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I agree with LibStar; the cited sources are only primary, which are useless for establishing notability. Diplomats are not inherently notable and this fails both the GNG and SIGCOV criteria. GrabUp - Talk 05:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I also did a lot of searching but couldn't find anything, so clearly fails WP:GNG Jannatulbaqi (talk) 17:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Source 1, 2, 3 (attributed twice) are primary and not secondary independent. No WP:SIGCOV on the Ambassador to pass WP:NBIO. Fails WP:GNG too. RangersRus (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I would allow it to exist, but the fairly clear consensus has developed that ambassadors are no longer automatically notable. Without significant coverage, and his personal life section completely (!) unreferenced, even an ambassador from one major BRIC country to another isn’t notable. Please ping me if you rescue this. Bearian (talk) 02:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.