Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday night blues
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. But no prejudice against recreation if someone wants to with proper sourcing (assuming there is any). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sunday night blues (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unsourced article on a "purported psychological condition". I see some coverage in popular press like the ELs, but they don't meet our standards for sourcing on mental health topics. Ultimately, with the number of big claims in this article, as is it's in WP:TNT territory at very minimum. Looks like it was prodded and contested by an IP afterwards. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I'd like to be charitable, but this really sounds like a bunch of nonsense that somebody made up on the spot. I agree. Deletion is absolutely the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No sources, and the ELs dont cut it. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 13:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This is a verifiable concept in pop psychology, e.g., two articles about it in Psychology Today [1],[2]. I could see WP:TNT for this article, perhaps a selective merge somewhere else, as it goes into synth beyond the sources. But I will keep this as a comment and not a recommendation, because I am unsure how pop psychology concepts fit into the space between MEDRS and GNG. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
17:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.