Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stav Beger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stav Beger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable producer. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV scope_creepTalk 21:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The consensus is there must be real coverage to WP:NMUSIC, which is not there. Passing mentions doesn't cover it, and that's all I can see. scope_creepTalk 09:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think so. It looks like PR. scope_creepTalk 20:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Beger is one of Israel's prominent music producers and songwriters and responsible to some of the major hits in the recent years. The above mentioned article is in Yedioth Ahronoth, it's exclusively about Beger and it's not pr, there is also almost an hour intreview with him in Kan. Tzahy (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the rest of the coverage, that should be visible for a WP:BLP. At the moment it still fails WP:SIGCOV. Where is the in-depth, intellectually independent secondary sources that are needed to establish notabilty. That article does look PR. Stating he is notable, without evidence isn't ideal. scope_creepTalk 09:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yedioth Ahronoth has a wall, and the full article is unfold only to paying subsribers, just like the NYT, WaPo and WSJ. Tzahy (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So far there is nothing substantial been shown. Lots of conjecture about being notable, but no evidence. scope_creepTalk 11:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.