The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rock of Ages (2012 film). Tone 13:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stacee Jaxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does a character in a upcoming film need its own page? Bihco (talk) 13:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, oh my gosh delete! This is all original research written in a non-encyclopedic format. Too bad someone kept removing the template because this absolutely is what speedy is meant for. There's no reason for this to be kept and the assertion that it's an upcoming film role by a notable actor is not a good reason to keep it. Most of Cruise's roles aren't notable enough for an article to themselves (and some of them are very well acted) and there's no reason to think that this would be any different.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
• Delete, non-notable, unsalvageable. CSD A7 doesn't apply, by the way, although I'd happily see this closed early through SNOW or IAR. Hairhorn (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the film. While it is indeed atrocious, nothing here is so bad that having it in the article history is actually causing harm anywhere. Jclemens (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Rock of Ages. --Ifnord (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the film article can describe the character. Sumanch (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Let's wait until the film is not only released, but makes a couple billion dollars before we deem this a legendary character in the league of Scarlett O'Hara. Also, blatant copyvio of incredibly bad press-release writing. Nate • (chatter) 20:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Either redirect to Rock of Ages or delete. The character is not notible. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 01:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Largely WP:CRYSTAL I have reinstated the AFD notice removed by an IP Arjayay (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Absolutely fails notability guidelines, not even close. Total ****ing mess to boot. Safiel (talk) 05:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.